WHY DOESN'T THE EARTH FALL TOWARDS THE SUN?

"The inability of the human mind; not the mind, but heart with the brightest rays of religion can penetrate the darkest corners of the Universe."

That’s why there is no way to test intersection between general relativity and quantum theory through laboratory experiments.

If the Sun has gravity, why doesn’t the Earth fall into the Sun or the Moon fall into the Earth?

Why do physicists these days say that Einstein’s theory of relativity is wrong?

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-physicists-these-days-say-that-Einstein%E2%80%99s-theory-of-relativity-is-wrong/answer/Gatot-S-Astari

"all prominent physicists accept the incredible success of general relativity as a working theory of gravity"

No, you're wrong, not the all prominent physicists agree as I mention in my answer.

1.Dr.Louis Essen, an inventor of atomic clock said:"Einstein's use of a thought experiment, together with his ignorance of experimental techniques, gave a result which fooled himself and generations of scientists."

RELATIVITY - joke or swindle?

2.Tom van Flandern: In 1998, physicist Tom Van Flandern authored a paper in Physics Letters A that remains one of the best refutations of Einstein’s version of relativity ever published. Van Flandern goes on to discuss GPS clocks, which are often cited as being proof positive of Einstein’s relativity. It may surprise you, but the GPS system doesn’t actually use Einstein’s field equations.

The Speed of Gravity: Why Einstein Was Wrong and Newton Was Right

I added here among others:

3.Julian Barbour, is a British physicist, Ph.D. degree on the foundations of Einstein's general theory of relativity at the University of Cologne in 1968. His 1999 book The End of Time advances timeless physics: the controversial view that time, as we perceive it, does not exist as anything other than an illusion, and that a number of problems in physical theory arise from assuming that it does exist.

4.Stephen Hawking: "Their measurement had been sheer luck, or a case of knowing the result they wanted to get." Hawking reports the widespread view that the errors in the data were as big as the effect they were meant to probe. Some go further, saying that Eddington deliberately excluded data that didn't agree with Einstein's prediction.

Arthur Eddington was innocent!

5.Dr. Edward Dowdye Jr: “I believe if Einstein were alive today, he would take advantage of the modern techniques and the modern instruments we have and he would wind up disproving his own theory,” said Dr. Dowdye, a physicist and laser optics engineer who retired from NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. He is an independent researcher and founder of Pure Classical Physics Research and he is a member of The American Physics Society.

Former NASA Physicist Disputes Einstein's Relativity Theory

6.Roger Anderton, Mathematical Physics, Cosmology, Theoretical Physics, said:

"Einstein Dogma enforced by American education system"

Papers written by Roger Anderton

Before I know many scientists disagree with Einstein's relativity, in 2010 I’ve found evidence from the reliable source that say Albert Einstein has no ideas on the basic of astronomy. The biggest thing Einstein was wrong because Einstein had no idea on the basic of astronomy.

GR predictions: “Einstein calculated the level of their deviation and predicted that for the stars observed being the closest to the sun, their deviation was about 1.75 seconds of arc.” This is has no scientific meaning because without taking into account the altitude of star/ Sun during eclipse.

In astronomy, deviation of stars light depend on their altitude. In this case, Einstein’s hypothesis of general relativity is not valid. It means GR doesn’t meet the requirements of the scientific method.

Beside that, two fatal mistakes of Einstein; he wants measuring deflection of light by the Sun; but he proposed test measuring deflection of light by Earth’s atmosphere; he had not realized about that. Ironically, this test is not scientifically correct and deeply wrong.

Something weird and magical when experimental test’s of general relativity, test via eclipse (1919, 1922, 1927, 1936, 1952, and 1973) or test using VLBI, the result is declared general relativity was correct. This is very embarrassing to the world of science. They are not aware of making themselves look so foolish. Why didn't they know Einstein's hypothesis is not valid? Einstein's hypothesis of GR can not be tested in any scientific way.

My reference: Lincoln Barnett’s book The Universe and Dr.Einstein, London, 1949, Foreword by Albert Einstein himself, pages 78–79.

Now we have a valid astronomical data prove spacetime is false.

Astronomical Data Prove Spacetime Fiction – Gatot Soedarto – Medium

IS IT TRUE THAT NEWTON'S GRAVITY IS NOT AS GOOD AS EINSTEIN'S GRAVITY?

“Imagination is more important than knowledge” (Albert Einstein)

Unfortunately, Einstein’s imagination lead him to the biggest blunder in modern physics for more than 100 years.

 Mercury-Photo by NASA

THE MOST IMPORTANT THING EINSTEIN HAD FAILED

When taking observe for finding the angle of bending of star light in the sky, knowing the altitude of star is just as important as measuring the time of moving celestial bodies. We must know the altitude of star quite exactly if observations are to be of any use. The reason for this is that the angle calculations all depend on the altitude of star.

FAST RADIO BURST (FRB)

ASTRONOMERS ON THE HUNT FOR MYSTERY DEEP SPACE SIGNALS JUST GOT A MAJOR BOOST

Representational image. A star forming region of space called the 30 Doradus Nebula. Understanding where in the universe FRBs come from will help us answer fundamental questions about the cosmos.-NASA/GETTY IMAGES

They’re mysterious bursts of radio waves from space that are over in a fraction of a second. Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are thought to occur many thousands of times a day, but since their first detection by the Parkes radio telescope a decade ago only 30 have been observed.

What Happens If Gravity Probe B Succeded Test General Relativity?

The Gravity Probe B experiment was carried out in collaboration between Stanford University, NASA, Lockheed Martin and KACST.

On 4 May 2011, NASA announced the long-awaited results of Gravity Probe (GP-B), and a month later the results appeared in Phys. After more than 47 years and 750 million dollars, GP-B had succeeded in measuring the general relativistic geodetic and frame-dragging effects on orbiting gyroscopes. In this focus issue, CQG publishes a set of refereed papers that provide the complete details of the experiment, from design of the spacecraft to the final data analysis, thus bringing to a close an extraordinary chapter in experimental gravitation.

Use Equivalence Principle And You’ll Look Like Einstein’s Happiest Thought

Einstein’s happiest thought (1907): “For an observer falling freely from
the roof of a house, the gravitational field does not exist” (left).
Conversely (right), an observer in a closed box — such as an elevator or
spaceship — cannot tell whether his weight is due to gravity or acceleration (einstein.stanford.edu)

High School Students Easily Be Able to Understand Einstein’s Gravity is False

Albert Einstein may be a genius, or may be Einstein’s genius is overrated. But he is a human; every human has limit. It does not matter someone has a college degree or not, as a human can make a mistake in his life. Sometimes those with a college degree like to appear as a fool. For example, if a person who is known as an expert in physics says “I’m certain, Einstein has always been right”. Of course, his statement made him look stupid.

We’ll easily be able to understand Einstein’s theory of gravity was totally wrong; even if our education advanced only through high school. Why so, and what’s the reason? That’s because Einstein’s mistakes are also at the elementary level: he had no idea on the basic of astronomy.

WHY DIDN'T THEY KNOW NONSENSE?

 Prediction at 2017 solar eclipse, August 21, in USA

The first calculation of the deflection of light by mass was published by the German astronomer Johann Georg von Soldner in 1801. Soldner showed that rays from a distant star skimming the Sun’s surface would be deflected through an angle of about 0.9 seconds of arc, or one quarter of a thousandth of a degree. This angle corresponds to the apparent diameter of a compact disc (CD) viewed from a distance of about 30 kilometers (nearly 20 miles). Soldner’s calculations were based on Newton’s laws of motion and gravitation, and the assumption that light behaves like very fast moving particles. As far as we know, neither Soldner nor later astronomers attempted to verify this prediction, and for good reason: Such an attempt would have been far beyond the capability of early 19th century astronomical instruments.
Light deflection in general relativity. Over a century later, in the early 20th century, Einstein developed his theory of general relativity. Einstein calculated that the deflection predicted by his theory would be twice the Newtonian value.The following image shows the deflection of light rays that pass close to a spherical mass. To make the effect visible, this mass was chosen to have the same value as the Sun’s but to have a diameter five thousand times smaller (i.e., a density 125 billion times larger) than the Sun’s.(www.einstein-online.info).

A Confirmation of General Relativity Won The Nobel Prize!

Stephen Hawking’s writings and statements are often surprising. As a world-leading physicist, not infrequently his writings and statements make a bit of a stir in the science world. If not he who says; it must be considered as a joke. But because he said that; then it is considered serious and gets more attention. For example, the writings and statements of Stephen Hawking in Nature in the early of 2014: ‘There are No black holes’. A number of physicists and astrophysicists reacted strongly against his idea.

These Are Not Photos of Black Holes

SCIENTISTS HAVE PEERED INTO A BLACK HOLE AND TAKEN A PHOTO OF ITS EVENT HORIZON FOR THE VERY FIRST TIME. From the initial image returned, scientists should be able to test relativity. “If you know the mass of the black hole—and for Sagittarius A* we know that well—and if you know the distance of the black hole, which again we know well, then relativity predicts you will see that shadow and ring and that the ring will have a certain diameter and it will be near circular. That’s a test of relativity. If the shape isn’t circular or the wrong size, then relativity has made a prediction that has failed. That’s the first thing we’ll look at.” (Event Horizon Telescope)

Event horizon telescope will be useless; the same as radio telescope (VLBI), LIGO's twin detector and other. Einstein’s gravity (general relativity) was totally wrong (Astronomical Data Prove Spacetime Fiction)

Eclipse’s Data of 1919 -1973 Verify Einstein’s Prediction Really Doesn’t Work

         

Image from Wikipedia

Hans C. Ohanian’s Einstein’s Mistakes: The Human Failings of Genius:

Almost all of Einstein’s seminal works contain mistakes. Sometimes small mistakes — mere lapses of attention — sometimes fundamental failures to understand the subtleties of his own creations, and sometimes fatal mistakes that undermined the logic of his arguments.

The book was reviewed positively in a recent Wall Street Journal article.

A theoretical physicist by training, Mr. Ohanian doesn’t write like one. He recounts his chronicle of errors in clear and engaging prose, giving us in the process a short course in the history of modern physics and a witty and provocative account of his subject’s life. Anyone who has read the recent biographies of Einstein by Walter Isaacson or Jürgen Neffe may find some of the material familiar, but on the whole “Einstein’s Mistakes” is original and fresh. Nor is Mr. Ohanian one of those petty biographers who delight only in turning up the failings — or turning out the dirty laundry — of great men. Rather he notes Einstein’s errors for a purpose, showing us why his achievement was all the greater for them.(Divided by zero)