Social Icons

Tampilkan postingan dengan label astronomy. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label astronomy. Tampilkan semua postingan

7 Januari 2020

About Proving Method of General Relativity

Evidence of Einstein’s Proving Method

The Evidence 2016The proving method of a theory as suggested by Einstein was recorded at the book ‘The Universe and Dr. Einstein’ written by Lincoln Barnett, published for the first time in London in June 1949. The Preface of this book was written by Albert Einstein himself.


“From these purely theoretical considerations Einstein concluded that light, like any material object, travels in a curve when passing through the gravitational field of a massive body. He suggested that his theory could be put to test by observing the path of starlight in the gravitational field of the Sun. Since the stars are invisible by day, there is only one occasion when Sun and stars can be seen together in the sky, and that is during an eclipse.

Einstein proposed therefore, that photographs be taken of the stars immediately bordering the darkened face of the sun during an eclipse and compared with photographs of those same stars made at another time. According to his theory, the light from the stars surrounding the Sun should be bent inward, toward the Sun, in traversing the Sun’s gravitational field; hence the images of these stars should appear to observer on earth to be shifted outward from their usual positions in the sky.

Einstein calculated the degree of deflection that should be observed and predicted that for the stars closest to the Sun the deviation would be about 1.75 seconds of an arc.Since he staked his whole General Theory of Relativity on this test, men of science throughout the world anxiously awaited the findings of expeditions which journeyed to equatorial regions to photograph the eclipse of May 29, 1919. When their pictures were developed and examined, the deflection of the starlight in the gravitational field of the sun was found to average 1.64 seconds— figure as close to perfect agreement with Einstein’s prediction as the accuracy of instruments allowed.“


The proving method on the theory on general relativity as requested by its founder, Albert Einstein, is not scientific and deeply wrong:

1.Deflection of light is the different angle between true position and apparent position of stars or the different of altitude. In astronomy, true position and apparent position of stars are three dimensionals.

All the photographs be taken of the stars are two dimensionals.

In this case Einstein ignored ‘The Space and Time’ or Celestial Sphere (Celestial Coordinate System), and ignored light refraction as the fundamental concepts in astronomy.

2.All the photographs be taken of solar eclipse ( the Sun and stars ) are photographs of the apparent positions of the Sun and stars. From these photos can not be use to calculate the deflection of light. No one can determine the correct angle of the deflection of light.

In this case Einstein ignored the experimental techniques

3.In astronomy, all calculations to determine the true position and the apparent position of a certain star at the sky is only applicable at a certain time and at a certain place on which such observation is performed.

To compared the photographs taken during an eclipse with photographs of those same stars made at another time is not scientific.

Conclusions: Einstein’s proving method for his hypothesis the deflection of light by the Sun is not scientific and deeply wrong. General relativity has been wrong since the beginning.




Backreaction.blogspot.com



19 Agustus 2017

EINSTEIN'S HYPOTHESIS OF GENERAL RELATIVITY IS INVALID







It is worth remembering Max Planck's response to Einstein when initially told of Einstein's plan to generalize relativity to include accelerated motions and explain gravitation as a geometric phenomena rather than being due to Newton's instantaneous action-at-a-distance "force".


Planck said: 'You are almost certainly wrong, and even if you are right, no one will believe you.'

Evidently, back ground of spacetime idea because he has no idea on the basic of astronomy; and not knowing that space and time has been applied in astronomy for long time ago. Einstein admired to Riemann geometry and 4 D (dimension) Minkovsky space, without considering the fact that Riemann geometry and Miskovsky space were not applied in astronomy. Therefore, his equation of general relativity (EFE) has no scientific meaning in astronomy.

Paperback-172 Pages

Kindle eBook Amazon

Navigator Reveals The Fact

DID YOU KNOW?
EINSTEIN'S HYPOTHESIS OF GENERAL RELATIITY IS NOT VALID
CAN NOT BE PROVEN OR TESTED IN ANY WAY WHATSOEVER


Hypothesis and Einstein proposed test of general relativity are closely related to astronomy, especially celestial navigation. For understanding that hypothesis and the test are not valid, physics training is needed; but more importantly is celestial navigation training. Unfortunately, physicists and astrophysicists are not trained to become experts in the field of celestial navigation. The navigators around the world will be easily to recognize the fatal flaws of these hypotheses and test. Actually, general relativity can not be proven or tested in any way. No doubt, the entire tests that says ‘general relativity is correct’ really are the case of ‘knowing the result they wanted to get’.

44 Articles on Medium April, 2016 - Sebtember , 2017


1.How to Show Gravity Affects Light


2.Where Does Energy of Inflation (Cosmology) Come From?


3.Einstein’s Thought Experiment Proves Newton Was Right.

4.I Need Not Prove My Claim, You Must Prove It Is False!-August 2017.

5.Einstein’s Thought Experiment Proves Special Relativity Is False

6.A Single Observation that Disagrees with the Prediction of General Relativity


7.The Field Equations of Gravitation (EFE) Violates the Basic of Astronomy

8.EEP: The Fallacy of Composition.

9.How could a Small Warped Spacetime Orbits a Large Warped Spacetime?

10.Top 4 Reasons Why GPS Doesn’t Need Einstein's Relativity.

11.Why Should We Return to the Moon?

12.What Causes Mercury’s Orbit the Most Eccentric?

13.Gravitational Lensing: Forcing a Claim in Science

14.Logical Fallacies of Standard Model of Physics Over Decades.

"Obviously the astronomers has to think of the Universe as space-time continuum."(Albert Einstein).
From this statement we know that the back ground of spacetime idea because he has no idea on the basic of astronomy; and not knowing that space and time has been applied in astronomy namely the celestial sphere coordinates system, for long time ago. Einstein admired to Riemann geometry and 4 D Minkovsky space, without considering the fact that Riemann geometry and Miskovsky space were not applied in astronomy. Einstein had not realized space-time continuum is a manifold. There is no such manifold in astronomy.

15.Black Holes and Big Bang are the Old Stories.



Can the eclipse tell us if Einstein was right about general relativity?


Unfortunately, I have to answer honestly: No, that's impossible because Einstein's hypothesis is not valid.(sciencenews.org)

Paperback-74 Pages


16.Why Doesn’t the Earth Fall Towards the Sun?

17.Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations

18.Is It True that Newton’s Gravity is Not as Good as Einstein's Gravity?

19.An Important Thing Einstein Had Failed

20.Gravitational Waves vs Gravity Waves

21.What Happens If Gravity Probe B Succeeded Test General Relativity?

22.What Happens If the Force of Gravity Doesn't Exist?

23.Use Equivalence Principle And You’ll Look Like Einstein’s Happiest Thought

24.High School Students Easily Be Able to Understand Einstein’s Gravity Is False

25.Why Didn’t They Know Nonsense?

26.A Confirmation of General Relativity Won The Nobel Prize!

27.Eclipse’s Data of 1919 -1973 Verify Einstein’s Prediction Really Doesn't Work.

28.Experimental Evidence Predictions of General Relativity Don't Work

29.What Is The Most Accurate Telescope?

30.VLBI Measurements: Only One Can Be Right.

31.Gravity Probe B: Mission Impossible?

32.Why Didn’t They Know 3D+1D Space and Time?

33.Astronomical Data Prove Spacetime Fiction.

34.Logical Fallacies Of Einstein's Theory.

35.Prediction on the 2017 Eclipse Proves Einstein Was Wrong.

36.Einstein’s Proving Method Via Eclipse Is Not Scientifically Correct and Deeply Wrong.

37.What’s Wrong With Measuring The Speed of Gravity in 2002?

38.Albert Einstein Failed in Three Classical Tests (Kindle eBook):


Paperback-Length 100 Pages

The main problem of general relativity is not test of hypothesis, but the hypothesis itself. Hypothesis and Einstein proposed test of general relativity are closely related to astronomy, especially celestial navigation. For understanding that hypothesis and the test are not valid, physics training is needed; but more importantly is celestial navigation training. The navigators around the world will be easily to know the fatal mistakes of Einstein's theories. 

Actually, general relativity can not be proven or tested in any way. No doubt, the entire tests that say ‘general relativity is correct’; really are the case of ‘knowing the result they wanted to get’. 

Last update: 7 Sebtember 2017


39.Sphere of Space and Time


41.Albert Einstein Began by Rejecting the Ether Theory.

42.Deflection of Light by Refraction, Not Gravity (Curve Geometry of Spacetime)

43.Albert Einstein’s Thought Experiment and Equivalence Principle are Misleading.

44.No doubt: Einstein’s General Theory Of Relativity Was Wrong-April, 2016.


Albert Einstein Was Innocent!

I know many renowned physicists (an inventor, professor, and experts) have rejected Einstein's theory. They had submitted their proof to Nature, but always rejected by Nature. Moreover, if they know that paper is made by someone who is not famous.

It made me think (maybe I was wrong), no need for peer review paper. International journals will refuse it. They are very embarrassed to publish it when knowing Einstein's mistake is an elementary level. The high school students easily are able to know about it. If they published it, it will drop the reputation of many the world renowned scientists and Universities (again, maybe I was wrong).

Actually, what I have found is not the same as they have found. What I have found was written in the book 'The Universe and Dr.Einstein', by Lincoln Barnett, London, 1949, foreword by Albert Einstein himself, page 78-79. He (Einstein) unknowingly has demonstrated to the world that he had no idea on the basic of astronomy.(Lincoln Barnett,The Universe and Dr Einstein)

Einstein's hypothesis of GR and he proposed test via eclipse are closely related to astronomy, especially celestial navigation. The navigators around the world easily are able to know:

1. Einstein’s hypothesis of GR is invalid. GR cannot be proven or tested in anyway whatsoever.

2. Einstein would like to measure deflection of light by the sun; but he proposed test deflection of light by earth's atmosphere. He had not realized about it. Ironically, this test is not scientifically correct and deeply wrong (as seen from scientifically of astronomy).

I think the next generation of scientists must know the truth about Einstein's relativity; as presented by a gentleman scientist below:

Is Einstein's Greatest Work All Wrong—Because He Didn't Go Far Enough? From a farmhouse in the English countryside, gentleman scientist Julian Barbour plots to take relativity to its logical extreme and redefine the very nature of gravity, space, and time. (Discovery Magazine)







Share

25 April 2017

WHY DIDN'T THEY KNOW NONSENSE?



 Prediction at 2017 solar eclipse, August 21, in USA
The first calculation of the deflection of light by mass was published by the German astronomer Johann Georg von Soldner in 1801. Soldner showed that rays from a distant star skimming the Sun’s surface would be deflected through an angle of about 0.9 seconds of arc, or one quarter of a thousandth of a degree. This angle corresponds to the apparent diameter of a compact disc (CD) viewed from a distance of about 30 kilometers (nearly 20 miles). Soldner’s calculations were based on Newton’s laws of motion and gravitation, and the assumption that light behaves like very fast moving particles. As far as we know, neither Soldner nor later astronomers attempted to verify this prediction, and for good reason: Such an attempt would have been far beyond the capability of early 19th century astronomical instruments.
Light deflection in general relativity. Over a century later, in the early 20th century, Einstein developed his theory of general relativity. Einstein calculated that the deflection predicted by his theory would be twice the Newtonian value.The following image shows the deflection of light rays that pass close to a spherical mass. To make the effect visible, this mass was chosen to have the same value as the Sun’s but to have a diameter five thousand times smaller (i.e., a density 125 billion times larger) than the Sun’s.(www.einstein-online.info).
 
Blogger Templates