Social Icons

Tampilkan postingan dengan label spacetime. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label spacetime. Tampilkan semua postingan

22 Mei 2017

What Happens If Gravity Probe B Succeded Test General Relativity?


The Gravity Probe B experiment was carried out in collaboration between Stanford University, NASA, Lockheed Martin and KACST.
On 4 May 2011, NASA announced the long-awaited results of Gravity Probe (GP-B), and a month later the results appeared in Phys. After more than 47 years and 750 million dollars, GP-B had succeeded in measuring the general relativistic geodetic and frame-dragging effects on orbiting gyroscopes. In this focus issue, CQG publishes a set of refereed papers that provide the complete details of the experiment, from design of the spacecraft to the final data analysis, thus bringing to a close an extraordinary chapter in experimental gravitation.

24 Maret 2017

NOW WE HAVE A VALID ASTRONOMICAL DATA PROVES SPACETIME FICTION



Now we have a valid astronomical data proves spacetime as a model really do not match up to data of 2017 eclipse, in USA, August 21.

A Valid Astronomical Data Proves Spacetime Fiction


What is fiction? According to Free Dictionary, fiction is the category of literature, drama, film, or other creative work whose content is imagined and is not necessarily based on fact. A narrative, explanation, or belief that may seem true but is false or fabricated: According to Encyclopaedia Britannica, fiction, literature created from the imagination, not presented as fact, though it may be based on a true story or situation. Types of literature in the fiction genre include the novel, short story, and novella. The word is from the Latin fictiō, “the act of making, fashioning, or molding.”


It was expected from 2017 solar eclipse in USA we can see 4 planets: Venus, Jupiter, Mars and Mercury. Actually, this natural phenomena is the best opportunity to prove Einstein’s idea on spacetime. 


4 Maret 2017

LOGICAL FALLACIES OF EINSTEIN'S THEORY






New Release Kindle eBook

New evidence has been found, Einstein proposed test of general relativity via eclipse is not scientifically correct and deeply wrong. The result will always be an error. In fact, the first experiment in the year of 1919 was error. That's why Einstein never received a Nobel Prize for his theory of gravity. Moreover, in Special and General Theory Of Relativity Einstein had no idea on the basic of astronomy, especially about the effect of refraction of light and celestial sphere coordinates system. 


There are at least 5 logical fallacies of Einstein's theories. To make sure that general theory of relativity was totally wrong, we can apply astronomical test of general relativity as described in this book, at the 2017 solar eclipse, Monday, August 21, in USA.



    The main source of this book is the book ‘ The Universe and Dr. Einstein’, by Lincoln Barnett, London, 1949, Foreword by Albert Einstein himself. Some reviews about this book:
    “This is a brilliant, readable and clear report, by a gifted journalist, of the significance of Einstein’s theories and their far reaching effect upon the modern world. Written for laymen, it penetrates the realms of space, explains the facts available on the nature of atoms, and merges for purposes of clarity, the relation between philosophy and modern science.Utilizing the theories of Newton, Planck, Gamow, Lemaitre and Jeans, Barnett explains the Einstein concept of the universe. Relating these scientific theories to the philosophical systems existing at the time, he shows how all forms of human activity are influenced by the discoveries of science, and how Einstein’s theories are a step in this long history of research.”
    “Everybody who has a mind, or who imagines he is a thinker, should understand this much of Relativity as a minimum.”—Philip Wylie
    “The Universe and Dr. Einstein sets a new standard in science writing and is, I think, the first American book that can be compared in maturity, clarity, and grace with the distinguished and influential works of Sir James Jeans and Sir Arthur Eddington.”—Gerald Wendt, N. Y. Herald Tribune Book Review
 (Pickle Partners Publishing on Aug 9, 2016)
    I agree with everything the above review says. In my opinion, the book The Universe and Dr.Einstein  is very interesting. This book shows that the author, Lincoln Barnett, really  is an expert in conveying his ideas, I mean, the ideas of Albert Einstein relates with his two popular theory, special  and general theory of relativity. Reading this book, as if I am dealing with Albert Einstein himself, who was telling the background of the invention of his theories.
    I assumed that the author of this book has conducted an interview with Albert Einstein himself, or at least has been made an intense of communication with Einstein.
    Albert Einstein himself wrote a foreword, and among other he states:
"Lincoln Barnett's book represents a valuable contribution to popular scientific writing. The main ideas of the theory of relativity are extremely well-presented. Moreover, the present state of our knowledge to physics is aptly characterized.

The author shows how the growth of our factual knowledge, together with the striving for a unified theoritical conception comprising all empirical data, has led to the present situation which is characterized-notwithstanding all successes-by uncertainty concerning the choice of the basics theoritcal concepts"
    Lincoln Barnett's book has a very important meaning for me, because I’ve  found a kind of valid proof about Einstein's theory, which it has not been revealed by others. I’ve found some of logical fallacies of Einstein ideas in the Lincoln Barnett’s book, relating with Einstein’s theory, special and general theory of relativity.
    What is logical fallacies?  Fallacies are defects that weaken arguments; Logical fallacies are errors in reasoning that invalidate the argument.
    A fallacy is an incorrect argument in logic and rhetoric which undermines an argument's logical validity or more generally an argument's logical soundness. Fallacies are either formal fallacies or informal fallacies.These are commonly used styles of argument in convincing people, where the focus is on communication and results rather than the correctness of the logic, and may be used whether the point being advanced is correct or not.
    Of course, some errors in reasoning of Einstein,  as the founder of theories, make a great impact to the validity of the two theories: Special and General theory of Relativity.

Paperback-Amazon

To make sure that general theory of relativity was totally wrong, we can apply astronomical test of general relativity, as described in this book, at the 2017 solar eclipse, Monday, August 21, in USA.



5.
Conclusion:
List Of Einstein’s Logical Fallacies

There are at least 5 logical fallacies of Einstein's special and general theory of relativity

1.Einstein’s Thought Experiment: Fallacy Of Composition.

2.The Equivalence Principle: A false equivalence

3.Spacetime: A fallacy of ambiguity or reification.

4.Einstein's Field Equation: Logical fallacy : argumentum ad lapidem
5.Einstein's proving method: The fallacy of ignoratio elenchi, or irrelevant conclusion.



Einstein's Field Equation Of Gravitation



Einstein had no idea of the units and disciplines of measurement as the goal of using mathematics in physics. EFE just a formal mathematical construct with no real physical meaning.
In the book The Universe and Dr.Einstein, by Lincoln Barnett, on page 78, we can read Einstein proposed test for his theory as evidence that Einstein had no idea on the basic of astronomy. Einstein proposed test of general relativity is not scientifically correct and deeply wrong.


    

The above is incorrect illustration, below is correct illustration



Apparent of star always looks higher than actual of star


Moreover, as he had written a foreword, he had not realized there is incorrect illustration on page 79, and it shows he does not understand about the effects of deviation of starlight in the real world, for example, when we see the stars in the sky at night. Einstein has no competence in the field of astronomy.





Read more on Medium:



New release paperback
CreateSpace


Read on Kindle Store Amazon


Share


29 Februari 2016

THOUGHT EXPERIMENTS : INCOMPREHENSIVE, ILLOGICAL, AND MISLEADING




Einstein's geometric gravity

The key idea of Einstein's theory of general relativity is that gravity is not an ordinary force, but rather a property of space-time geometry.(ensteinonlineinfo)

If that is true, the property of space-time geometry should give effects / pressure on the celestial bodies that makes celestial bodies is not spherical but a flat.




"This physicists are still in the elevator, but this time they really are in the empty space, far away from the attractive power of any celestial body.A cable is attached to the roof of the elevator; some supernatural force begins reeling in the cable; and the elevator travels "upward" with constant acceleration, i.e. progressively faster and faster. Again the men in the car have no idea where they are, and again they perform experiments to evaluate their situation. This time they notice that their feet press solidly against the floor come up beneath them.

If they release objects from their hands, the objects appear to "fall".If they toss object in a horizontal direction they do not move uniformly in a straight line, but describe a parabolic curve with respect to the floor.


And so the scientist, who have no idea that their windowless car actually is climbing through interstellar space, conclude that they are situated in quite ordinary circumstances in a stationary room rigidly attached to the earth and affected in normal measure by the force of gravity. There is no way for them to tell whether they are at rest in a gravitational field or ascending with constant acceleration through outer space where there is no gravity at all.
...............

So Einstein's Law of Gravitation contain nothing about force. It describes the behavior of objects in a gravitational field - the planets, for example - not in terms "attraction" but simply in the terms of the paths they follow. To Einstein, gravitation is simply part of inertia; the movements of stars and the planets arise from their inherent inertia; and the courses they follow are determined by the metric properties of space -- or, more properly speaking, the metric properties of the space-time continum.


(Universe and Dr.Eintein, Lincoln Barnett, London 1949,  page 69 - 72).



Explanations:


Einstein thought experiments describe three events that become the objects of observation in the elevator .


1. They notice that their feet press solidly against the floor come up beneath them.


2. If they release objects from their hands, the objects appear to "fall".


3.. If they toss object in a horizontal direction they do not move uniformly in a straight line, but describe a parabolic curve with respect to the floor.


From these three events in the elevator ,  an  observer outside the elevators conlude  that gravity is nothing about force. Furthermore describes the behavior of objects in a gravitational field - the planets, for example - not in terms "attraction" but simply in the terms of the paths they follow.


That is incorrect.  Three objects of observations  do not fully describe the Newton's theory of gravity, namely can not describe at least two other events that caused by the force of gravity:



1. The celestial bodies in orbit, for example, the orbiting of the planets around the Sun.



2. The occurrence of tide-low tide caused by the attraction of the moon.



Of course it will be very difficult to illustrate two things mentioned above in the elevator. What could be described in the elevator is only related to objects that have weight and mass. Therefore, the thought experiments is always incomprehensive, illogical, and can be misleading.



Thought experiments can be made to obtain the result they wanted to get. Albert Einstein made a mistake in his thought experiments.The equivalence principle is wrong !

Isaac Newton's theory of gravitation first enabled an explanation of why there were generally two tides a day, not one, and offered hope for detailed understanding. How about Enstein's general relativity on tide-low tide??.
 


Eksperimen Imajiner Einstein menjadi dasar idenya tentang gravitasi, di mana idenya itu berbeda dengan teori gravitasi Isaac Newton.

"Para fisikawan masih berada di dalam elevator/lift, tapi kali ini mereka benar-benar berada di ruang kosong, jauh dari gaya tarik-menarik benda-benda angkasa. Kabel diikat di atap lift, lalu ada kekuatan supranatural menarik kabel ke atas;.. dan lift naik "ke atas" dengan percepatan konstan, yaitu semakin cepat dan lebih cepat lagi. Orang-orang (fisikawan) di dalam lift/kendaraan itu tidak tahu di mana mereka berada, dan lagi mereka sedang melakukan percobaan untuk mengevaluasi situasi mereka saat ini. Mereka melihat/merasakan bahwa kaki mereka menekan kuat terhadap lantai lift di bawah mereka.

Jika mereka melepaskan benda dari tangan mereka, benda-benda itu terlihat "jatuh" ke lantai lift. Jika mereka melemparkan sebuah benda dalam arah horisontal, benda itu tidak bergerak dalam garis lurus, tapi bergerak melengkung/kurva parabola terhadap lantai lift.

Dan jadi para fisikawan tidak tahu bahwa lift/kendaraan yang tanpa jendela itu  benar-benar naik/mendaki melalui ruang antar bintang, menyimpulkan bahwa mereka berada di kendaraan dalam keadaan biasa yang sedang berhenti di suatu tempat di bumi, dan terpengaruh oleh gaya gravitasi dalam ukuran normal. Tidak ada cara bagi mereka untuk mengatakan apakah mereka beristirahat dalam medan gravitasi atau naik dengan percepatan konstan melalui luar angkasa di mana tidak ada gravitasi sama sekali.
...............


Jadi Hukum Gravitasinya Einstein tidak berisi apa-apa tentang gaya /kekuatan. Tapi menggambarkan perilaku objek dalam medan gravitasi - planet-planet, misalnya - tidak dalam hal "gaya tarik" tetapi hanya dalam hal jalan yang mereka ikuti. Bagi Einstein, gravitasi hanya bagian dari inersia; pergerakan bintang dan planet-planet timbul dari inersia yang melekat mereka; dan lintasan yang mereka lalui yang ditentukan oleh sifat metrik ruang - atau, lebih tepatnya, sifat kontinum dari metrik ruang-waktu.

(Universe dan Dr.Eintein, Lincoln Barnett, London 1949, halaman 69-72, terjemahan).




Setiap orang yang mempelajari teorinya Enstein dan membaca eksperimen imajinernya di atas, pertama kali akan terkesan dan kagum, dan lalu membenarkan gagasan Einstein tentang gravitasi sesuai imajinasi tersebut: gravitasi bukan suatu gaya/force, melainkan suatu kelembaman atau gerak dari suatu obyek mengikuti lengkungan di ruang angkasa atau Lengkungan Ruang-Waktu. Tidak ada gaya tarik-menarik antara bintang-bintang dan planet-planet.

Pertanyaan: Apakah ada kekeliruan dalam eksperimen imajiner Einstein di atas itu, di mana letak kesalahannya, dan penjelasannya?

Jawaban:

Ada kekeliruan, dan kekeliruannya termasuk fatal, karena eksperimen imajiner itu digunakan untuk menjelaskan dan menjadi dasar dari ' persamaan ' dalam teori gravitasinya, yaitu Teori Relativitas Umum atau General Relativity Theory.



Di mana letak kesalahan, dan penjelasannya?

Di dalam eksperimen imajiner di atas digambarkan 3 (tiga) peristiwa yang menjadi obyek pengamatan para fisikawan di dalam elevator/lift :

1.Mereka melihat/merasakan bahwa kaki mereka menekan kuat terhadap lantai lift di bawah mereka.

2.Jika mereka melepaskan benda dari tangan mereka, benda-benda itu terlihat "jatuh" ke lantai lift.

3.Jika mereka melemparkan sebuah benda dalam arah horisontal, benda itu tidak bergerak dalam garis lurus, tapi bergerak melengkung/kurva parabola terhadap lantai lift.

Tiga objek peristiwa di dalam elevator yang bergerak naik ke atas dengan percepatan konstan, di dalam ruang /angkasa yang bebas gravitasi, oleh pengamat di luar elevator (Albert Einstein) diambil suatu kesimpulan bahwa gravitasi bukan suatu gaya (nothing about force). Lebih jauh diambil kesimpulan : 'menggambarkan perilaku objek dalam medan gravitasi - planet-planet, misalnya - tidak dalam hal "gaya tarik" tetapi hanya dalam hal jalan yang mereka ikuti.'

Kekeliruannya, tiga obyek pengamatan sesuai yang dimaksud di atas tidak menggambarkan secara utuh teori gravitasinya Newton, yaitu tidak bisa menggambarkan paling tidak 2 (dua) peristiwa yang disebabkan oleh adanya gaya gravitasi:

1.Peredaran benda-benda angkasa dalam orbitnya, misalnya peredaran planet-planet mengelilingi matahari.

2.Terjadinya gerakan air pasang dan surut disebabkan gaya tarik dari bulan.

Tentu saja akan sangat sulit menggambarkan dua hal tersebut di atas di dalam elevator. Apa yang bisa digambarkan di dalam elevator hanyalah berkaitan dengan benda yang memiliki berat dan massa. Oleh karenanya, eksperimen imajiner tidak bisa lengkap (incomprehensive), tidak logis, dan bisa menyesatkan. Eksperimen imajiner biasa digunakan untuk menjelaskan hasil sesuai apa yang diinginkan oleh yang membuatnya.


Eksperimen imajiner Einstein untuk menjelaskan idenya tentang gravitasi berupa imajinasi sebuah elevator yang naik ke atas dengan percepatan konstan, atau rocket yang melaju ke atas di empty space (bebas gravitasi), atau elevator yang jatuh bebas.








einsteinonlineinfo



Semuanya itu menjelaskan efek gravitasi terhadap suatu benda, yaitu benda jatuh, berkas sinar yang tampak melengkung di dalam elevator yang jatuh bebas, atau manusia dan benda-benda yang hilang bobotnya sehingga melayang. Tidak ada satupun eksperimen imajinernya yang menjelaskan peredaran benda-benda angkasa dalam orbitnya dan terjadinya pasang-surut (tide-low tide) air laur. 

Dari penjelasan yang tidak lengkap itu Albert Einstein mengambil kesimpulan, bahwa tidak ada cara bagi mereka ( pengamat di dalam elevator atau rocket ) untuk mengatakan apakah mereka beristirahat dalam medan gravitasi, atau naik dengan percepatan konstan melalui luar angkasa di mana tidak ada gravitasi sama sekali. Kesimpulan yang diambil dijadikan semacam prinsip, yang dikenal sebagai The equivalence principle.

Dipandang dari metoda penalaran ilmiah, metoda yang digunakan oleh Albert Einstein ialah metoda penalaran induktif, yaitu penalaran dari hal-hal/kejadian yang khusus, lalu diambil kesimpulan secara umum. Namun kejadian-kejadian khusus yang dijelaskan oleh Albert Einstein tidak lengkap (inconprenhensive), karena justru ada kejadian penting di space-time - menggunakan term yang digunakan - yang tidak bisa dijelaskan dengan eksperimen imajiner, yaitu pengaruh gaya gravitasi yang menyebabkan gerak rotasi benda-benda angkasa dalam orbitnya. Dan juga tidak dijelaskan, pengaruh gaya gravitasi Bulan yang menimbulkan gerakan air laut pasang dan surut.

Metoda penalaran induktif yang salah ini pula yang digunakan oleh LIGO 'menemukan' gelombang gravitasi dari dua black holes tabrakan yang terjadi 1.3 milyar tahun cahaya dari bumi, penemuan itu dipublikasikan pada tanggal 11 Februari yang lalu. Penemuan itu dikatakan oleh LIGO telah membuktikan kebenaran prediksi Einstein pada tahun 1916. Padahal faktanya, Einstein tidak memprediksi dua black holes tabrakan. Albert Einstein dikenal dalam dunia sains sebagai ilmuwan yang enggan menerima gagasan tentang black holes. Ide itu berasal dari persamaan medannya, namun Einstein tidak setuju. Sampai meninggalnya di tahun 1955, Albert Einstein belum merubah pendapatnya : tetap pada pendiriannya enggan menerima gagasan black holes. Sehingga dia dikenal dengan sebutan The Reluctant Father of Black Holes.

Di dalam manuskrip tulisan tangan Einstein pada tahun 1916, yang juga dipublikasikan oleh LIGO, jelas tertulis : "Two celestial bodies in orbit generate ripples in spacetime ...". Terjemahannya " Dua benda angkasa dalam orbitnya menimbulkan gelombang gravitasi ...". Sama sekali tidak ada hubungannya dengan 'penemuan' LIGO ...........Suatu penalaran induktif yang salah jika LIGO mengklaim membenarkan prediksi Einstein di tahun 1916 tentang ripples in spacetime atau gravitational waves, atau jika LIGO mengklaim telah berhasil membuktikan kebenaran teori Relativitas Umum.Einstein.



"It's quite remarkable that, more than 100 years after Einstein's theory was written down, we still don't fully understand what solutions to Einstein's equations look like," Kunesch said. "We still need to establish whether it is completely consistent theoretically. There are still lots of open questions, both on the theoretical level but also on the more experimental level." (5D Black Holes Could Break Relativity)

Einstein's equations look like Einstein's thought experiments, incomprehensive, illogical, and misleading.



The most contradiction between Special and General Relativity Theory is about the existing aether. Special Relativity say aether do not exist, but General Relativity say aether exist. And many of physicist who believe in General Relativity ignored the existing of aether.

Einstein sometimes used the word aether for the gravitational field within general relativity, but this terminology never gained widespread support.





NOW WE KNOW General Relativity is wrong .









Share


 
Blogger Templates