New Release Kindle eBook
New evidence has been found, Einstein proposed test of general relativity via eclipse is not scientifically correct and deeply wrong. The result will always be an error. In fact, the first experiment in the year of 1919 was error. That's why Einstein never received a Nobel Prize for his theory of gravity. Moreover, in Special and General Theory Of Relativity Einstein had no idea on the basic of astronomy, especially about the effect of refraction of light and celestial sphere coordinates system.
There are at least 5 logical fallacies of Einstein's theories. To make sure that general theory of relativity was totally wrong, we can apply astronomical test of general relativity as described in this book, at the 2017 solar eclipse, Monday, August 21, in USA.
New evidence has been found, Einstein proposed test of general relativity via eclipse is not scientifically correct and deeply wrong. The result will always be an error. In fact, the first experiment in the year of 1919 was error. That's why Einstein never received a Nobel Prize for his theory of gravity. Moreover, in Special and General Theory Of Relativity Einstein had no idea on the basic of astronomy, especially about the effect of refraction of light and celestial sphere coordinates system.
There are at least 5 logical fallacies of Einstein's theories. To make sure that general theory of relativity was totally wrong, we can apply astronomical test of general relativity as described in this book, at the 2017 solar eclipse, Monday, August 21, in USA.
The main source of this book is the book ‘ The Universe and Dr.
Einstein’, by Lincoln Barnett, London, 1949, Foreword by Albert Einstein
himself. Some reviews about this book:
“The Universe and Dr. Einstein sets a new standard in science writing and is, I think, the first American book that can be compared in maturity, clarity, and grace with the distinguished and influential works of Sir James Jeans and Sir Arthur Eddington.”—Gerald Wendt, N. Y. Herald Tribune Book Review
(Pickle Partners Publishing on Aug 9, 2016)
I agree with everything the above review says. In my opinion, the book The Universe and Dr.Einstein is very interesting. This book shows that the author, Lincoln Barnett, really is an expert in conveying his ideas, I mean, the ideas of Albert Einstein relates with his two popular theory, special and general theory of relativity. Reading this book, as if I am dealing with Albert Einstein himself, who was telling the background of the invention of his theories.
I assumed that the author of this book has conducted an interview with Albert Einstein himself, or at least has been made an intense of communication with Einstein.
Albert Einstein himself wrote a foreword, and among other he states:
"Lincoln Barnett's book represents a valuable contribution to popular scientific writing. The main ideas of the theory of relativity are extremely well-presented. Moreover, the present state of our knowledge to physics is aptly characterized.
The author shows how the growth of our factual knowledge, together with the striving for a unified theoritical conception comprising all empirical data, has led to the present situation which is characterized-notwithstanding all successes-by uncertainty concerning the choice of the basics theoritcal concepts"
“This
is a brilliant, readable and clear report, by a gifted journalist, of the
significance of Einstein’s theories and their far reaching effect upon the
modern world. Written for laymen, it penetrates the realms of space, explains
the facts available on the nature of atoms, and merges for purposes of clarity,
the relation between philosophy and modern science.Utilizing the theories of
Newton, Planck, Gamow, Lemaitre and Jeans, Barnett explains the Einstein
concept of the universe. Relating these scientific theories to the
philosophical systems existing at the time, he shows how all forms of human
activity are influenced by the discoveries of science, and how Einstein’s
theories are a step in this long history of research.”
“Everybody who has a mind, or
who imagines he is a thinker, should understand this much of Relativity as a
minimum.”—Philip Wylie“The Universe and Dr. Einstein sets a new standard in science writing and is, I think, the first American book that can be compared in maturity, clarity, and grace with the distinguished and influential works of Sir James Jeans and Sir Arthur Eddington.”—Gerald Wendt, N. Y. Herald Tribune Book Review
(Pickle Partners Publishing on Aug 9, 2016)
I agree with everything the above review says. In my opinion, the book The Universe and Dr.Einstein is very interesting. This book shows that the author, Lincoln Barnett, really is an expert in conveying his ideas, I mean, the ideas of Albert Einstein relates with his two popular theory, special and general theory of relativity. Reading this book, as if I am dealing with Albert Einstein himself, who was telling the background of the invention of his theories.
I assumed that the author of this book has conducted an interview with Albert Einstein himself, or at least has been made an intense of communication with Einstein.
Albert Einstein himself wrote a foreword, and among other he states:
"Lincoln Barnett's book represents a valuable contribution to popular scientific writing. The main ideas of the theory of relativity are extremely well-presented. Moreover, the present state of our knowledge to physics is aptly characterized.
The author shows how the growth of our factual knowledge, together with the striving for a unified theoritical conception comprising all empirical data, has led to the present situation which is characterized-notwithstanding all successes-by uncertainty concerning the choice of the basics theoritcal concepts"
Lincoln Barnett's book
has a very important meaning for me, because I’ve found a kind of valid proof about Einstein's
theory, which it has not been revealed by others. I’ve found some of logical
fallacies of Einstein ideas in the Lincoln Barnett’s book, relating with
Einstein’s theory, special and general theory of relativity.
What is logical
fallacies? Fallacies are
defects that weaken arguments; Logical fallacies are errors in reasoning that
invalidate the argument.
A fallacy is an incorrect
argument in logic and rhetoric which undermines an argument's logical validity
or more generally an argument's logical soundness. Fallacies are either formal
fallacies or informal fallacies.These are commonly used styles of argument in
convincing people, where the focus is on communication and results rather than
the correctness of the logic, and may be used whether the point being advanced
is correct or not.
Of course, some errors in reasoning of
Einstein, as the founder of theories,
make a great impact to the validity of the two theories: Special and General
theory of Relativity.
Paperback-Amazon
To make sure that general theory of relativity was totally wrong, we can apply astronomical test of general relativity, as described in this book, at the 2017 solar eclipse, Monday, August 21, in USA.
To make sure that general theory of relativity was totally wrong, we can apply astronomical test of general relativity, as described in this book, at the 2017 solar eclipse, Monday, August 21, in USA.
5.
Conclusion:
List Of Einstein’s Logical Fallacies
There are at least 5 logical fallacies of Einstein's special and
general theory of relativity
1.Einstein’s Thought Experiment: Fallacy
Of Composition.
2.The Equivalence Principle: A false equivalence
3.Spacetime: A fallacy of ambiguity or
reification.
4.Einstein's Field Equation: Logical fallacy : argumentum ad
lapidem
5.Einstein's
proving method: The fallacy of ignoratio elenchi, or irrelevant conclusion.
Einstein's Field Equation Of Gravitation
Einstein had no idea
of the units and disciplines of measurement as the goal of using mathematics in
physics. EFE just a formal mathematical construct with no real physical meaning.
In the book The Universe and Dr.Einstein,
by Lincoln Barnett, on page 78, we can read Einstein proposed
test for his theory as evidence that Einstein had no idea on the basic of
astronomy. Einstein proposed test of general relativity is not scientifically
correct and deeply wrong.
The above is incorrect illustration, below is correct illustration
Apparent of star always looks higher than actual of star
Moreover, as he had written a foreword, he
had not realized there is incorrect illustration on page 79, and it shows he
does not understand about the effects of deviation of starlight in the real
world, for example, when we see the stars in the sky at night. Einstein has no
competence in the field of astronomy.
Read more on Medium:
New release paperback
CreateSpace
CreateSpace
Read on Kindle Store Amazon
