Social Icons

Featured Posts

3 Februari 2016

EINSTEIN'S PROVING METHOD VIA ECLIPSE IS NOT SCIENTIFIC, DEEPLY WRONG.


For more than 100 years, we’ve only been playing around in experiments so far
Genius has two sides, cleverness and stupidity. General relativity is the stupidity. 




Einstein's proving method for his hypothesis of general relativity via eclipse is not scientific. Did you have any reason and facts?

Yes.Let's look at the picture below.


 Courtesy of google image


At the picture we see an illustration the deflection of starlight by gravity. Deflection of light is a different angular between Actual Position and Apparent position of star. Another term for Actual position is True Position, and another term for Apparent position is Observed Position of star. In astronomy, true position and observed position of star is three dimensional (the Celestial Coordinate System). In practice,  the deflection of light is a different Altitude or Hight (H) between hight of star at true position and hight of star at observed position.

Then, let see the proving method as suggested by Albert Einstein:


“From these purely theoretical considerations Einstein concluded that light, like any material object, travels in a curve when passing through the gravitational field of a massive body. He suggested that his theory could be put to test by observing the path of starlight in the gravitational field of the sun. Since the stars are invisible by day, there is only one occasion when sun and stars can be seen together in the sky, and that is during an eclipse.

Einstein proposed therefore, that photographs be taken of the stars immediately bordering the darkened face of the sun during an eclipse and compared with photographs of those same stars made at another time. According to his theory, the light from the stars surrounding the sun should be bent inward, toward the sun, in traversing the sun’s gravitational field; hence the images of these stars should appear to observer on earth to be shifted outward from their usual positions in the sky.

Einstein calculated the degree of deflection that should be observed and predicted that for the stars closest to the sun the deviation would be about 1.75” (Lincoln Barnett, The Universe and Dr.Einstein, London, Victor Gollanez LTD, First Published June 1949, Preface by Albert Einstein, page 78-79 ).



Reasons and Facts ::



1. “Einstein proposed therefore, that photographs be taken of the stars immediately bordering the darkened face of the sun during an eclipse and compared with photographs of those same stars made at another time.”

The words ‘ made at another time ‘  means it was  NOT SCIENTIFIC in the scientific point of view of astronomy. Deeply wrong.

2.The deflection of light is a different angular between True Positions and Apparent Positions of the stars. From Einstein’s proving method via eclipse no one can determine True Positions of the star All of photographs be taken of the stars, before eclipse and during eclipse are the conditions of the stars in Apparent Positions.


It is really hard to understand that Einstein’s proving method of his hypothesis that was not scientific,  that was conducted by a team led by Arthur Eddington in 1919 solar Eclipse.


Expedition 1919 Solar Eclipse

Based on data from the Royal Astronomical Society, Arthur Eddington aimed to the group of Hyade stars from the city of Oxford in England at the nights in the months of January and February 1919. After that, Eddington together with his team left for Principe Island in West of Africa, and aimed to the Hyade stars during the solar eclipse on the date of May 29, 1919 at the city of Roca Sundy. Andrew Crommelin's team aimed to the Hyade stars during the solar eclipse from Sobral, Brazil.

Oxford, Roca Sundy and Sobral has it own CELESTIAL SPHERE : Celestial Sphere for an observer in Oxford, Celestial Sphere for an observer in Roca Sundy.and Celestial Sphere for an observer in Sobral.   

Portrait of star taken by an observer from Oxford and portrait the same star from Roca Sundy ( and from Sobral ) can not be compared, because the Celestial Sphere is only applicable at a certain time and at a certain place on which such observation is performed.

The result was ERROR. 


Facts :



Error and the deflection of light was certainly not measurable. 

Einstein predicted : 1.75 seconds of an arc.

Arthur Eddington : 1.61seconds of an arc. (During 1919 eclipse an observer in Roca Sundy. The weather conditions in Roca Sundy. Principe Island-West Africa, were interferret with by clouds).

Andrew Crommelin: 0.93 seconds of an arc.(During 1919 eclipse an observer in Sobral. The weather conditions in Sobral, Brazil, were excellent).



That is why Einstein never received a Nobel prize for relativity

The Nobel Prize in Physics 1921 was awarded to Albert Einstein "for his services to Theoretical Physics, and especially for his discovery of the law of the photoelectric effect".The Nobel citation reads that Einstein is honoured for "services to theoretical physics, and especially for his discovery of the law of the photoelectric effect".

At first glance, the reference to theoretical physics could have been a back door through which the committee acknowledged relativity. However, there was a caveat stating that the award was presented "without taking into account the value that will be accorded your relativity and gravitation theories after these are confirmed in the future".

To many, and to Einstein himself, this felt like a slap in the face. Hadn't Eddington proved the theory? Yes, but the trouble was Eddington's observations had not been perfect and he had discarded data he considered poor from his final analysis.



Hadn't Eddington proved the theory?  NO. THAT WAS ERROR. BIG LIE IN SCIENCE FOR MORE THAN 100 YEARS

You can applied Einstein's proving method 1000 times and the result will be ERROR !



Read More:

About Sir Arthur Stanley Eddington 



Just experiments, again and again ....We’ve only been playing around in Newton’s world so far
If a scientist conveys a theory and at the same time shows its proving method, however after being examined it is found out that his proposed proving method is proven to be unable to be performed due to not being scientific, then automatically such proposed theory prematurely falls by itself. And the test cannot be carried out by other methods not as requested by the theory founder, since it is reasonably assumed that such proving is made based on belief. 







BOLD EXPERIMENTS WILL PUT GENERAL RELATIVITY TO THE TEST


Powerful telescopes and huge gravitational wave detectors will test a theory that one man worked out a century ago with a pencil and paper.


Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity remade gravity and solved problems that Newton’s theory couldn’t. It’s passed each of the dozens of experimental tests devised since its debut in 1915. But physicists have barely gotten started.

“We’ve only been playing around in Newton’s world so far,” says Neil Cornish, a physicist at Montana State University. That will soon change, though, as several bold experiments enabled by telescopes of unprecedented reach — and in some cases by entirely new ways to gather data — are poised to study how gravity behaves around some of the universe’s most extreme objects.

“This is where general relativity really gets going,” says Cornish. Powerful telescopes are already looking for minute hiccups in the whirring of stellar corpses called pulsars. A global effort will soon photograph, for the first time, a black hole. And huge gravitational wave detectors will scan thousands of galaxies for tiny ripples in the cosmic fabric of space-time.

Each of these experiments — some of the most ambitious ever conceived — will test a theory that one man worked out a century ago with pencil and paper. Yet most physicists are still betting on that one man.


 Read More :

DISCOVERMAGAZINE

Paperback

If Einstein's theory of general relativity was correct, then the light from stars that passed closest to the sun would show the greatest degree of bending, and the stars whose light tracks are very far from the sun have their lights not being bent or deflected. The stars whose lights are not deflected means that there is no difference between the apparent position and the true position of the stars.
If being consistent with this theory, it means that all stars visible at night time are at the appearance of the stars on their true positions, because the said stars do not pass through the field of gravity. This is certainly incorrect if it is seen from the astronomical scientific point of view. The stars in the sky at night time and seen by the observers, all are stars on apparent positions, not on their true positions.

Einstein ignored light refraction: astronomical refraction and terrestrial refraction, and ignored three dimensional positions of stars (celestial sphere coordinate system), when he proposed the proving method for general relativity. Einstein's proving method via eclipse is not scientific and deeply wrong. General Relativity has been wrong since the beginning.





divine-music.info
divine-music.info





Share

9 Januari 2016

POSISI STRATEGIS KEPULAUAN SPRATLY DAN PARACEL


rtf.org


Arti Penting dan Posisi Strategis Kepulauan Spratly dan Paracel 
    
Hingga saat ini belum ada angka pasti berapa sebenarnya jumlah pulau yang terdapat dalam gugusan Kepulauan Spratly dan Paracel, karena beberapa pulau sering kali hilang di saat air pasang tinggi dan bahkan ada yang sedang tumbuh. Pantauan terakhir sebuah pulau baru muncul di sebelah Utara negara bagian Sabah Malaysia pada tahun 1988. Kepulauan Spratly umumnya terdiri dari kumpulan atol, batu karang, gosong berpasir yang tidak berpenghuni serta terletak pada rangkaian garis vulkanis. Membentang dan meliputi area seluas lebih dari 250.000 km2 di bagian Selatan Laut China Selatan dengan panjang lebih dari 500 km dari Utara ke Selatan.

28 Oktober 2015

THE COMING REVOLUTION IN U.S. NAVAL STRATEGY


James Holmes

The Chief of Naval Operations, John Richardson, winged his way to Newport around the beginning of the month to discuss maritime strategy with the Naval War College (NWC) teaching and research faculty and generally hobnob with students, staff and faculty. Which is fitting: the Navy’s top uniformed officer should tarry at its intellectual seat from time to time—gleaning such strategic and operational insight as we ivory-tower dwellers alongside the Narragansett Bay can supply.

ANGRY CHINA FOLLOWED U.S.WARSHIP NEAR ARTIFICIAL ISLAND IN DISPUTED SEA





The US Navy guided-missile destroyer USS Lassen sails in the Pacific Ocean in a November 2009 photo provided by the U.S. Navy. The U.S. Navy sent a guided-missile destroyer within 12 nautical miles of artificial islands built by China in the South China Sea on October 27, a U.S. defense official said, in a challenge to China's territorial claims in the area.


The U.S. Navy sent a guided-missile destroyer close to China's man-made islands in the disputed South China Sea on Tuesday, drawing an angry rebuke from Beijing, which said it warned and followed the American vessel.

1 Oktober 2015

ARE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHERS TOO INFLUENCED BY CORPORATIONS ?




We like to think academic researchers are motivated purely by the desire to make progress in the fields of science and medicine. But a new report published Tuesday finds that as many as 1 in 10 board positions at for-profit health care companies are held by researchers affiliated with a nonprofit or academic institution. While there aren’t any national guidelines set up to prevent these relationships, researchers and other experts say the overlap amounts to a huge conflict of interest and has the potential to influence academic work.

23 Agustus 2015

TRUE, GENERAL RELATIVITY IS WRONG


New Release



Einstein’s prediction of light deflection could not be tested immediately in 1915, because the First World War was in progress, and it was not until 1919 that a British expedition, observing an eclipse from West Africa, showed that light was indeed deflected by the sun, just as predicted by the theory. This proof of a German theory by British scientists was hailed as a great act of reconciliation between the two countries after the war. It is ionic, therefore, that later examination of the photographs taken on that expedition showed the errors were as great as the effect they were trying to measure. Their measurement had been sheer luck, or a case of knowing the result they wanted to get, not an uncommon occurrence in science.(Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time, 1985).

The tests of General Relativity as suggested by Einstein : the photo taken to the stars at the time when the sun was dark during the solar eclipse was compared to the photo of the same stars taken at another time’. The words ‘at another time’ means proposal suggested by Einstein is not at all scientific, the reasons are explained by the following pictures.


Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 1 is two stars portrait taken by an observer from point A in the earth at a time, and Figure 2 is the same portrait of two star, taken by the same observer from point B in the earth at another timeeg two months later. Point A located in Europe, while the point B located in the Africa continent, the two point  has a big different of the latitude and longitude.
    The two sightings of  stars will always be different because point A and B has its own Celestial Sphere. The Celestial Sphere is only applicable at a certain time and at a certain place on which such observation is performed. Therefore, the two portraits can not be compared.
    And again ..... the two portraits is the appearance of Apparent Position of the two stars, not the the True Position. Therefore,  from the two portraits could not be use to calculate the angular difference between True Position and Apparent Position of stars that becomes the object of observation.
Conclusions: The tests / proving method on the theory on general relativity as requested by its founder, Albert Einstein, is unjustifiable from scientific point of view of the astronomy. In addition, a hypothesis stating that the light is bent by gravity of massive object ignores the existence of light refraction (Snell’s Law). 
   If a scientist conveys a theory and at the same time shows its proving method, however after being tested by another scientist it is found out that his proposed proving method is proven to be unable to be performed due to not being scientific, then automatically such proposed theory prematurely falls by itself. And the proving cannot be  carried out by other methods not  as requested by the theory founder, since it is reasonably assumed that such proving is made based on belief.
    The general relativity theory has been wrong since the beginning. True, general relativity theory is wrong.


divine-music.info
divine-music.info

One More Night


"One More Night"
You and I go hard at each other like we're going to war.
You and I go rough, we keep throwing things and slamming the door.
You and I get so damn dysfunctional, we stopped keeping score.
You and I get sick, yeah, I know that we can't do this no more.

Yeah, but baby there you go again, there you go again, making me love you.
Yeah, I stopped using my head, using my head, let it all go.
Got you stuck on my body, on my body, like a tattoo.
And now I'm feeling stupid, feeling stupid, crawling back to you.

So I cross my heart and I hope to die
That I'll only stay with you one more night
And I know I said it a million times
But I'll only stay with you one more night

Try to tell you "no" but my body keeps on telling you "yes".
Try to tell you "stop", but your lipstick got me so out of breath.
I'll be waking up in the morning, probably hating myself.
And I'll be waking up, feeling satisfied but guilty as hell.

Yeah, but baby there you go again, there you go again, making me love you.
(Making me love you)
Yeah, I stopped using my head, using my head, let it all go.
(I let it all go)
Got you stuck on my body, on my body, like a tattoo.
(Like a tattoo, yeah)
And now I'm feeling stupid, feeling stupid, crawling back to you.

So I cross my heart and I hope to die
(Yeah)
That I'll only stay with you one more night
(Oh)
And I know I said it a million times
(Yeah)
But I'll only stay with you one more night
(Yeah)

Yeah, baby, give me one more night
Yeah, baby, give me one more night (whoa, yeah)
Yeah, baby, give me one more night (oh, yeah, yeah)

Yeah, but baby there you go again, there you go again making me love you.
Yeah, I stopped using my head, using my head, let it all go.
Got you stuck on my body, on my body like a tattoo.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah

So I cross my heart and I hope to die
(Oh oh oh oh, oh oh oh oh)
That I'll only stay with you one more night
(Oh oh oh oh oh oh)
And I know I said it a million times
(Oh, I said it a million times)
But I'll only stay with you one more night
(Yeah, baby give me one more night)

So I cross my heart and I hope to die (yeah, yeah)
That I'll only stay with you one more night (yeah, yeah)
And I know I said it a million times (yeah, yeah)
But I'll only stay with you one more night (yeah, yeah)

I don't know, whatever.







10 Agustus 2015

STEPHEN HAWKING: THERE ARE NO BLACK HOLE




The defining characteristic of a black hole may have to give, if the two pillars of modern physics — general relativity and quantum theory — are both correct.



Einstein ignored light refraction: astronomical refraction and terrestrial refraction, when he proposed the proving method for general relativity.Click to read more Kindle Edition



Di dalam buku ' A Brief history of time.pdf ' Stephen Hawking menulis yang intinya menyatakan bahwa teori Black Holes yang dicetuskannya keliru jika nantinya terbukti teori relativitas umum (general relativity) itu salah. Teori relativitas umum yang bertahan selama hampir satu abad sejak dicetuskan oleh Einstein pada tahun 1916, dan selalu menimbulkan kontroversi, sekarang semakin jelas kelirunya.

Einstein mengabaikan adanya refraksi cahaya ( light refraction ). Pembelokan cahaya bintang yang melewati medan gravitasi matahari bukan disebabkan karena pengaruh medan gravitasi matahari sesuai hipothesisnya dalam teori relativitas umum, melainkan disebabkan karena refraksi cahaya.  Jika cahaya tidak dipengaruhi oleh gravitasi, maka black hole adalah sesuatu yang tidak mungkin terjadi. Dengan kata lain, singularitas yang diprediksi oleh Einstein tidak akan pernah terjadi ...................


Light deflection is not caused by gravity, but by refraction.


In astronomy, the deflection of light is something very common, and not caused by gravity field of a massive object, but it occurs due to  the light refraction: astronomical refraction and terrestrial refraction . astrobasik )


Notion of an 'event horizon', from which nothing can escape, is incompatible with quantum theory, physicist claims.

Zeeya Merali
24 January 2014

12 Juli 2015

CHINA’S MASTER PLAN TO THWART AMERICAN DOMINANCE IN ASIA






And it's using India and Russia to its advantage.

Nikolas K.Gvosdes
July 11, 2015


One of China’s overriding strategic goals is to thwart the U.S. rebalance of attention and resources to the Asia-Pacific region. At the twin summits of the Brazil-Russia-India-China-South Africa forum (BRICS) and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) in Ufa, Russia, President Xi Jinping presented the outlines of the triple approach that Beijing will utilize.

28 Mei 2015

CHINA’S MILITARY STRATEGY


 



BEIJING, May 26 (Xinhua) -- The Information Office of the State Council on Tuesday published a white paper on China's military strategy.

21 Mei 2015

SCIENCE AND RELIGION






Opinion: Science & Religion: A Centuries-old War Rages On

While some in the scientific and religious communities have declared an end to the tensions between faith and fact, the conflict continues to have impacts on health, politics, and the environment.

24 April 2015

DILEMA STRATEGI MARITIM CHINA DI LAUT CHINA SELATAN




Pada bulan Desember 2012 pemerintah provinsi Hainan di Selatan mengeluarkan peraturan yang membolehkan kapal-kapal Coast Guard China menghentikan dan menaiki kapal-kapal asing yang memasuki perairan yang diklaimnya dan mengharuskan mereka ke luar dari situ. Kapal perang China juga pernah bersitegang dengan kapal perang India, di Laut China Selatan, di mana China mengancam akan menutup perusahaan minyak India yang melakukan explorasi di Vietnam. Beberapa kejadian di atas mengisyaratkan betapa China konsisten dengan Forward Policy nya, sehingga banyak pengamat ingin menganalisis bagaimana strategi maritimnya di Laut China Selatan.
  

31 Maret 2015

PROF.HOWARD WISEMAN : EINSTEIN WAS WRONG




 dailymail.co.uk

 

Einstein was WRONG: 'Spooky' quantum experiment shows that the measurement of a photon affects its location

  • Previous experiments have shown entanglement with two particles 
  • But this is the first  to show the entanglement of a photon with itself
  • The study reveals how when a light photon is observed it changes state
  • Einstein didn't believe this could happen as it violates theory of relativity 


By Ellie Zolfagharifard

Albert Einstein may have been a genius, but even he could get it wrong sometimes.
 
Blogger Templates