Social Icons

Featured Posts

25 April 2017


 Prediction at 2017 solar eclipse, August 21, in USA
The first calculation of the deflection of light by mass was published by the German astronomer Johann Georg von Soldner in 1801. Soldner showed that rays from a distant star skimming the Sun’s surface would be deflected through an angle of about 0.9 seconds of arc, or one quarter of a thousandth of a degree. This angle corresponds to the apparent diameter of a compact disc (CD) viewed from a distance of about 30 kilometers (nearly 20 miles). Soldner’s calculations were based on Newton’s laws of motion and gravitation, and the assumption that light behaves like very fast moving particles. As far as we know, neither Soldner nor later astronomers attempted to verify this prediction, and for good reason: Such an attempt would have been far beyond the capability of early 19th century astronomical instruments.
Light deflection in general relativity. Over a century later, in the early 20th century, Einstein developed his theory of general relativity. Einstein calculated that the deflection predicted by his theory would be twice the Newtonian value.The following image shows the deflection of light rays that pass close to a spherical mass. To make the effect visible, this mass was chosen to have the same value as the Sun’s but to have a diameter five thousand times smaller (i.e., a density 125 billion times larger) than the Sun’s.(

19 April 2017

A Confirmation of General Relativity Won The Nobel Prize!

Stephen Hawking’s writings and statements are often surprising. As a world-leading physicist, not infrequently his writings and statements make a bit of a stir in the science world. If not he who says; it must be considered as a joke. But because he said that; then it is considered serious and gets more attention. For example, the writings and statements of Stephen Hawking in Nature in the early of 2014: ‘There are No black holes’. A number of physicists and astrophysicists reacted strongly against his idea.

16 April 2017

These Are Not Photos of Black Holes

SCIENTISTS HAVE PEERED INTO A BLACK HOLE AND TAKEN A PHOTO OF ITS EVENT HORIZON FOR THE VERY FIRST TIME. From the initial image returned, scientists should be able to test relativity. “If you know the mass of the black hole—and for Sagittarius A* we know that well—and if you know the distance of the black hole, which again we know well, then relativity predicts you will see that shadow and ring and that the ring will have a certain diameter and it will be near circular. That’s a test of relativity. If the shape isn’t circular or the wrong size, then relativity has made a prediction that has failed. That’s the first thing we’ll look at.” (Event Horizon Telescope)
Event horizon telescope will be useless; the same as radio telescope (VLBI), LIGO's twin detector and other. Einstein’s gravity (general relativity) was totally wrong (Astronomical Data Prove Spacetime Fiction)

14 April 2017

Eclipse’s Data of 1919 -1973 Verify Einstein’s Prediction Really Doesn’t Work

Image from Wikipedia
Hans C. Ohanian’s Einstein’s Mistakes: The Human Failings of Genius:
Almost all of Einstein’s seminal works contain mistakes. Sometimes small mistakes — mere lapses of attention — sometimes fundamental failures to understand the subtleties of his own creations, and sometimes fatal mistakes that undermined the logic of his arguments.
The book was reviewed positively in a recent Wall Street Journal article.
A theoretical physicist by training, Mr. Ohanian doesn’t write like one. He recounts his chronicle of errors in clear and engaging prose, giving us in the process a short course in the history of modern physics and a witty and provocative account of his subject’s life. Anyone who has read the recent biographies of Einstein by Walter Isaacson or Jürgen Neffe may find some of the material familiar, but on the whole “Einstein’s Mistakes” is original and fresh. Nor is Mr. Ohanian one of those petty biographers who delight only in turning up the failings — or turning out the dirty laundry — of great men. Rather he notes Einstein’s errors for a purpose, showing us why his achievement was all the greater for them.(Divided by zero)

10 April 2017


Experimental Evidence Predictions of General Relativity Don’t Work

Why Einstein will never be wrong. One of the benefits of being an astrophysicist is your weekly email from someone who claims to have “proven Einstein wrong”. These either contain no mathematical equations and use phrases such as “it is obvious that..”, or they are page after page of complex equations with dozens of scientific terms used in non-traditional ways. They all get deleted pretty quickly, not because astrophysicists are too indoctrinated in established theories, but because none of them acknowledge how theories get replaced.(Prof.Brian Koberlein).
Of course not, obviously not because astrophysicists are too indoctrinated in established theories, but because astrophycists (and physicists) has no experiences in celestial navigation as a navigator at sea (not less than two years).

5 April 2017


Need to know the basic level of astronomy, in order to know that collecting data of stars - comparing data made at another time - can not be use to measure deviation of starlight. Measuring the angle in astronomy applies direct measuring and instantaneous.  It doesn't matter using a sophisticated software, if doesn't meet requirements in the basic principle of scientific method in the field of astronomy; should be classified as a non-scientific.
Thank to Sir Isaac Newton
The idea of “a small telescope” or a sextant employing a movable mirror was first conceived by Isaac Newton in 1700. Workable instruments were made in 1730; sextant in this form has been in use for 250 years, and will be used into the foreseeable future. The name is derived from the Latin sextant, or sixth part of a circle. Due to the arrangement of the optic, the sextant will actually measure angles up to one third of a circle, or 120 degrees. The octants and quadrant are similar instruments, with ranges of 90 and 180 degrees.
A sextant can also be used to measure the lunar distance between the moon and another celestial object (such as a star or planet) in order to determine Greenwich Mean Time and hence longitude. The principle of the instrument was first implemented around 1730 by John Hadley (1682–1744) and Thomas Godfrey (1704–1749), but it was also found later in the unpublished writings of Isaac Newton (1643–1727)-(
On the first glance you might think that a sextant looks pretty complicated, but it really isn’t. There are only three basic parts, as shown in figure below, and the parts of the “small telesope” are clearly described on wikipedia.

2 April 2017


New measurement of solar gravitational deflection of radio signals using VLBI.RADIO observations using very-long-baseline interferometry (VLBI) can measure the deflection of electromagnetic radiation by the Sun’s gravitational field with an accuracy of better than 1 milliarcsecond, and can thus be used to test General Relativity.(

31 Maret 2017


NASA’s Gravity Probe B (GP-B) mission has confirmed two key predictions derived from Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity, which the spacecraft was designed to test. The experiment, launched in 2004, used four ultra-precise gyroscopes to measure the hypothesized geodetic effect, the warping of space and time around a gravitational body, and frame-dragging, the amount a spinning object pulls space and time with it as it rotates. GP-B determined both effects with unprecedented precision by pointing at a single star, IM Pegasi, while in a polar orbit around Earth.(

29 Maret 2017


Why didn’t they know space and time were combined together in astronomy almost forever? If “it is a theory not only of curved space, but of curved or warped time as well”, how did this theory measure the time for different kinds of time, for examples, True Solar Time, Mean Solar Time, and Sidereal Time?

24 Maret 2017


Now we have valid data that prove spacetime as a model really do not match up to astronomical data of 2017 eclipse, in USA, August 21.

Astronomical Data Prove Spacetime Fiction

What is fiction? According to Free Dictionary, fiction is the category of literature, drama, film, or other creative work whose content is imagined and is not necessarily based on fact. A narrative, explanation, or belief that may seem true but is false or fabricated: According to Encyclopaedia Britannica, fiction, literature created from the imagination, not presented as fact, though it may be based on a true story or situation. Types of literature in the fiction genre include the novel, short story, and novella. The word is from the Latin fictiō, “the act of making, fashioning, or molding.”

It was expected from 2017 solar eclipse in USA we can see 4 planets: Venus, Jupiter, Mars and Mercury. Actually, this natural phenomena is the best opportunity to prove Einstein’s idea on spacetime. 

20 Maret 2017


There are at least 5 logical fallacies of Einstein's special and general theory of relativity, and this book reveals evidence and reasoning that general relativity doesn't meet the principles of scientific method.
This book try to convey prediction using astronomical test of general relativity  at 2017 total solar eclipse, in USA, August 21, and  shows that astronomical data of 2017 eclipse prove spacetime is false.


I would like to express my gratitude to the many people who saw me through my books; to all those who provided support, read, buy, and offered comments.

Thank so much to Lincoln Barnett, hopefully be happy in Heaven, for tells  me through his book The Universe and Dr.Einstein. Thank so much to Dr.Louis Essen, hopefully be happy in Heaven, and Professor Tom Van Flanderm, who make me sure about invalidity of general relativity.

Here my claims:
Einstein’s hypothesis of deflection of light by the Sun is false, and Einstein proposed test of deflection of light by the Sun via eclipse is not scientifically correct and deeply wrong, the results will always be an error. Einstein general theory of relativity was totally wrong. I’ve explained evidence and reasoning in this book entitle Logical Fallacies Of Special And General Theory Of Relativity, Second Edition: General Relativity Doesn’t Meet The Principles Of Scientific Method.

Last and not least: my apologies for any my shortcomings on writing in a language not my mother’s language.

Kindle eBook Amazon.


4 Maret 2017


New Release Kindle eBook

New evidence has been found, Einstein proposed test of general relativity via eclipse is not scientifically correct and deeply wrong. The result will always be an error. In fact, the first experiment in the year of 1919 was error. That's why Einstein never received a Nobel Prize for his theory of gravity. Moreover, in Special and General Theory Of Relativity Einstein had no idea on the basic of astronomy, especially about the effect of refraction of light and celestial sphere coordinates system. 

There are at least 5 logical fallacies of Einstein's theories. To make sure that general theory of relativity was totally wrong, we can apply astronomical test of general relativity as described in this book, at the 2017 solar eclipse, Monday, August 21, in USA.

    The main source of this book is the book ‘ The Universe and Dr. Einstein’, by Lincoln Barnett, London, 1949, Foreword by Albert Einstein himself. Some reviews about this book:
    “This is a brilliant, readable and clear report, by a gifted journalist, of the significance of Einstein’s theories and their far reaching effect upon the modern world. Written for laymen, it penetrates the realms of space, explains the facts available on the nature of atoms, and merges for purposes of clarity, the relation between philosophy and modern science.Utilizing the theories of Newton, Planck, Gamow, Lemaitre and Jeans, Barnett explains the Einstein concept of the universe. Relating these scientific theories to the philosophical systems existing at the time, he shows how all forms of human activity are influenced by the discoveries of science, and how Einstein’s theories are a step in this long history of research.”
    “Everybody who has a mind, or who imagines he is a thinker, should understand this much of Relativity as a minimum.”—Philip Wylie
    “The Universe and Dr. Einstein sets a new standard in science writing and is, I think, the first American book that can be compared in maturity, clarity, and grace with the distinguished and influential works of Sir James Jeans and Sir Arthur Eddington.”—Gerald Wendt, N. Y. Herald Tribune Book Review
 (Pickle Partners Publishing on Aug 9, 2016)
    I agree with everything the above review says. In my opinion, the book The Universe and Dr.Einstein  is very interesting. This book shows that the author, Lincoln Barnett, really  is an expert in conveying his ideas, I mean, the ideas of Albert Einstein relates with his two popular theory, special  and general theory of relativity. Reading this book, as if I am dealing with Albert Einstein himself, who was telling the background of the invention of his theories.
    I assumed that the author of this book has conducted an interview with Albert Einstein himself, or at least has been made an intense of communication with Einstein.
    Albert Einstein himself wrote a foreword, and among other he states:
"Lincoln Barnett's book represents a valuable contribution to popular scientific writing. The main ideas of the theory of relativity are extremely well-presented. Moreover, the present state of our knowledge to physics is aptly characterized.

The author shows how the growth of our factual knowledge, together with the striving for a unified theoritical conception comprising all empirical data, has led to the present situation which is characterized-notwithstanding all successes-by uncertainty concerning the choice of the basics theoritcal concepts"
    Lincoln Barnett's book has a very important meaning for me, because I’ve  found a kind of valid proof about Einstein's theory, which it has not been revealed by others. I’ve found some of logical fallacies of Einstein ideas in the Lincoln Barnett’s book, relating with Einstein’s theory, special and general theory of relativity.
    What is logical fallacies?  Fallacies are defects that weaken arguments; Logical fallacies are errors in reasoning that invalidate the argument.
    A fallacy is an incorrect argument in logic and rhetoric which undermines an argument's logical validity or more generally an argument's logical soundness. Fallacies are either formal fallacies or informal fallacies.These are commonly used styles of argument in convincing people, where the focus is on communication and results rather than the correctness of the logic, and may be used whether the point being advanced is correct or not.
    Of course, some errors in reasoning of Einstein,  as the founder of theories, make a great impact to the validity of the two theories: Special and General theory of Relativity.


To make sure that general theory of relativity was totally wrong, we can apply astronomical test of general relativity, as described in this book, at the 2017 solar eclipse, Monday, August 21, in USA.

List Of Einstein’s Logical Fallacies

There are at least 5 logical fallacies of Einstein's special and general theory of relativity

1.Einstein’s Thought Experiment: Fallacy Of Composition.

2.The Equivalence Principle: A false equivalence

3.Spacetime: A fallacy of ambiguity or reification.

4.Einstein's Field Equation: Logical fallacy : argumentum ad lapidem
5.Einstein's proving method: The fallacy of ignoratio elenchi, or irrelevant conclusion.

Einstein's Field Equation Of Gravitation

Einstein had no idea of the units and disciplines of measurement as the goal of using mathematics in physics. EFE just a formal mathematical construct with no real physical meaning.
In the book The Universe and Dr.Einstein, by Lincoln Barnett, on page 78, we can read Einstein proposed test for his theory as evidence that Einstein had no idea on the basic of astronomy. Einstein proposed test of general relativity is not scientifically correct and deeply wrong.


The above is incorrect illustration, below is correct illustration

Apparent of star always looks higher than actual of star

Moreover, as he had written a foreword, he had not realized there is incorrect illustration on page 79, and it shows he does not understand about the effects of deviation of starlight in the real world, for example, when we see the stars in the sky at night. Einstein has no competence in the field of astronomy.

Read more on Medium:

New release paperback

Read on Kindle Store Amazon


Blogger Templates