Now we have a valid astronomical data proves spacetime as a model really do not match up to data of 2017 eclipse, in USA, August 21.
A Valid Astronomical Data Proves Spacetime Fiction
What is fiction? According to Free Dictionary, fiction is the category of literature, drama, film, or other creative work whose content is imagined and is not necessarily based on fact. A narrative, explanation, or belief that may seem true but is false or fabricated: According to Encyclopaedia Britannica, fiction, literature created from the imagination, not presented as fact, though it may be based on a true story or situation. Types of literature in the fiction genre include the novel, short story, and novella. The word is from the Latin fictiō, “the act of making, fashioning, or molding.”
It was expected from 2017 solar eclipse in USA we can see 4 planets: Venus, Jupiter, Mars and Mercury. Actually, this natural phenomena is the best opportunity to prove Einstein’s idea on spacetime.
We can see from left to right: Jupiter, Regulus, Mercury, Mars, and Venus, and data of apparent altitude planets and stars in the eclipse sky at time of total eclipse over Madras, Oregon, can be seen on table in figure below.
In this writing our interest is selecting 4 objects: Mercury, Regulus, Mars, and Venus at time during 2017 solar eclipse over Madras, Oregon, USA.
As seen from the Earth, the four celestial bodies can be pictured in below.
Let’s note astronomical data of apparent altitude of the Sun/Moon, Star (Regulus) and Planets, in degrees and minutes of an arc:
Mercury: 31.2, Regulus : 40.8, Sun/Moon: 41.6, Mars : 49.1, Venus : 65.3
Now imagine, long time ago we got indoctrinated to believe in the existence of curved space.
Image from Wikipedia
But now, we have astronomical data the altitude of 2017 solar eclipse and altitude star and planets, and our interest is plotting their light tracks. Light tracks of Mercury, Regulus, Mars, and Venus can be pictured in the curvature of space, as seen in figure below.
From the above figure, if spacetime of general relativity was correct, deviation of Regulus light track should be greater than deviation of Mercury light track, and deviation of Mars light track should be greater than deviation of Venus light track.
In the above figure, p is the light track of Regulus, q is the light track of Mercury, s is the light track of Mars, and r is the light track of Venus.
Deviation of Regulus: dp.
Deviation of Mercury: dq.
Deviation of Mars: ds.
Deviation of Venus: dr.
According to general relativity, the star light visible around the Sun would be bent inwards, toward the Sun at the time when passing through the gravity field of the Sun. Einstein calculated the level of their deviation and predicted that for the stars observed being the closest to the Sun, their deviation was about 1.75 seconds of an arc.
Therefore, deviation of Regulus (dp) should be about 1.75 sec.arc, and the deviation of Regulus (dp) should be greater than deviation of Mercury, or dp > dq. In the same way the deviation of Mars (ds) should be greater than deviation of Venus (dr), or ds > dr.
Now we can start to validate Einstein’s spacetime.
To do this, let’s look at the Nautical Almanac of 2017.
It is important to note that apparent altitude correction of Mars and Venus can not apply the correction of star. Especially for apparent altitude correction of Venus and Mars, in the Nautical Almanac of 2017 as seen in figure above.
The table shows correction for Venus is the same with Mars: + 0,1. Now we can apply height of eye of 2,5 meters, and then calculate the deviation of Mercury, Regulus, Mars, and Venus. Height of eye of 2,5 meters is a minimum. If we taking sight using sextant from ships at sea, or from a building at the beach, let’s say the height of place an obsever is about 10 meters or more, the apparent correction is greater than correction of 2,5 meters.
The above table shows the results:
1.Deviation of Regulus (dp) is: -3.9 minutes, or -234 sec.arc. It is more than 100 times greater than 1.75 sec.arc as Einstein’s prediction. It’s proof that general relativity is wrong.
2.dp is -3.9 minutes, while dq is -4.4 minutes, or dp < dq. It’s mean that light doesn’t travel as a curve. It’s proof that a curvature space is false.
3.dr is -2.7 and ds is the same -2.7. It’s also proof that a curvature space is false.
Thus, a spacetime as a model really do not match up to astronomical data of 2017 eclipse.
Now we have a valid astronomical data of 2017 solar eclipse, in USA, August 21, that proof spacetime is nonsense.
Einstein Field Equation Of Gravitation (EFE)
In the above figure, p is the light track of Regulus, q is the light track of Mercury, s is the light track of Mars, and r is the light track of Venus.
Deviation of Regulus: dp.
Deviation of Mercury: dq.
Deviation of Mars: ds.
Deviation of Venus: dr.
According to general relativity, the star light visible around the Sun would be bent inwards, toward the Sun at the time when passing through the gravity field of the Sun. Einstein calculated the level of their deviation and predicted that for the stars observed being the closest to the Sun, their deviation was about 1.75 seconds of an arc.
Therefore, deviation of Regulus (dp) should be about 1.75 sec.arc, and the deviation of Regulus (dp) should be greater than deviation of Mercury, or dp > dq. In the same way the deviation of Mars (ds) should be greater than deviation of Venus (dr), or ds > dr.
Now we can start to validate Einstein’s spacetime.
To do this, let’s look at the Nautical Almanac of 2017.
It is important to note that apparent altitude correction of Mars and Venus can not apply the correction of star. Especially for apparent altitude correction of Venus and Mars, in the Nautical Almanac of 2017 as seen in figure above.
The table shows correction for Venus is the same with Mars: + 0,1. Now we can apply height of eye of 2,5 meters, and then calculate the deviation of Mercury, Regulus, Mars, and Venus. Height of eye of 2,5 meters is a minimum. If we taking sight using sextant from ships at sea, or from a building at the beach, let’s say the height of place an obsever is about 10 meters or more, the apparent correction is greater than correction of 2,5 meters.
The above table shows the results:
1.Deviation of Regulus (dp) is: -3.9 minutes, or -234 sec.arc. It is more than 100 times greater than 1.75 sec.arc as Einstein’s prediction. It’s proof that general relativity is wrong.
2.dp is -3.9 minutes, while dq is -4.4 minutes, or dp < dq. It’s mean that light doesn’t travel as a curve. It’s proof that a curvature space is false.
3.dr is -2.7 and ds is the same -2.7. It’s also proof that a curvature space is false.
Thus, a spacetime as a model really do not match up to astronomical data of 2017 eclipse.
Now we have a valid astronomical data of 2017 solar eclipse, in USA, August 21, that proof spacetime is nonsense.
Einstein Field Equation Of Gravitation (EFE)
Our interest at the moment is finding the truth. As we know, Einstein Field Equation Of Gravitation is usually written in the form:
The left-hand side of that equation is a matrix of numbers represents the curvature of spacetime as determined by the metric. The right-hand side is a matrix of quantum operators represents the matter/energy content of spacetime. Einstein’s equations connect mass to spacetime curvature. The mathematical quantity associated with space-time curvature is the Riemann tensor.
The meaning of EFE, as we know, that the curvature of spacetime contains density and flux of energy and momentum, or:
Curvature of spacetime = density and flux of energy and momentum.
Here a big question: What happen if spacetime is nonsense?
