EINSTEIN'S HYPOTHESIS OF GENERAL RELATIVITY IS INVALID

It is worth remembering Max Planck's response to Einstein when initially told of Einstein's plan to generalize relativity to include accelerated motions and explain gravitation as a geometric phenomena rather than being due to Newton's instantaneous action-at-a-distance "force".


Planck said: 'You are almost certainly wrong, and even if you are right, no one will believe you.'

Evidently, back ground of spacetime idea because he has no idea on the basic of astronomy; and not knowing that space and time has been applied in astronomy for long time ago. Einstein admired to Riemann geometry and 4 D (dimension) Minkovsky space, without considering the fact that Riemann geometry and Miskovsky space were not applied in astronomy. Therefore, his equation of general relativity (EFE) has no scientific meaning in astronomy.

Paperback-172 Pages

Kindle eBook Amazon

Navigator Reveals The Fact

DID YOU KNOW?

EINSTEIN'S HYPOTHESIS OF GENERAL RELATIITY IS NOT VALID

CAN NOT BE PROVEN OR TESTED IN ANY WAY WHATSOEVER

Hypothesis and Einstein proposed test of general relativity are closely related to astronomy, especially celestial navigation. For understanding that hypothesis and the test are not valid, physics training is needed; but more importantly is celestial navigation training. Unfortunately, physicists and astrophysicists are not trained to become experts in the field of celestial navigation. The navigators around the world will be easily to recognize the fatal flaws of these hypotheses and test. Actually, general relativity can not be proven or tested in any way. No doubt, the entire tests that says ‘general relativity is correct’ really are the case of ‘knowing the result they wanted to get’.

44 Articles on Medium April, 2016 - Sebtember , 2017


1.How to Show Gravity Affects Light


2.Where Does Energy of Inflation (Cosmology) Come From?

3.Einstein’s Thought Experiment Proves Newton Was Right.

4.I Need Not Prove My Claim, You Must Prove It Is False!-August 2017.

5.Einstein’s Thought Experiment Proves Special Relativity Is False

6.A Single Observation that Disagrees with the Prediction of General Relativity

7.The Field Equations of Gravitation (EFE) Violates the Basic of Astronomy

8.EEP: The Fallacy of Composition.

9.How could a Small Warped Spacetime Orbits a Large Warped Spacetime?

10.Top 4 Reasons Why GPS Doesn’t Need Einstein's Relativity.

11.Why Should We Return to the Moon?

12.What Causes Mercury’s Orbit the Most Eccentric?

13.Gravitational Lensing: Forcing a Claim in Science

14.Logical Fallacies of Standard Model of Physics Over Decades.

"Obviously the astronomers has to think of the Universe as space-time continuum."(Albert Einstein).
From this statement we know that the back ground of spacetime idea because he has no idea on the basic of astronomy; and not knowing that space and time has been applied in astronomy namely the celestial sphere coordinates system, for long time ago. Einstein admired to Riemann geometry and 4 D Minkovsky space, without considering the fact that Riemann geometry and Miskovsky space were not applied in astronomy. Einstein had not realized space-time continuum is a manifold. There is no such manifold in astronomy.

15.Black Holes and Big Bang are the Old Stories.

Can the eclipse tell us if Einstein was right about general relativity?

Unfortunately, I have to answer honestly: No, that's impossible because Einstein's hypothesis is not valid.(sciencenews.org)

Paperback-74 Pages

Kindle eBook Amazon UK

Amazon US

Amazon Canada

16.Why Doesn’t the Earth Fall Towards the Sun?

17.Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations

18.Is It True that Newton’s Gravity is Not as Good as Einstein's Gravity?

19.An Important Thing Einstein Had Failed

20.Gravitational Waves vs Gravity Waves

21.What Happens If Gravity Probe B Succeeded Test General Relativity?

22.What Happens If the Force of Gravity Doesn't Exist?

23.Use Equivalence Principle And You’ll Look Like Einstein’s Happiest Thought

24.High School Students Easily Be Able to Understand Einstein’s Gravity Is False

25.Why Didn’t They Know Nonsense?

26.A Confirmation of General Relativity Won The Nobel Prize!

27.Eclipse’s Data of 1919 -1973 Verify Einstein’s Prediction Really Doesn't Work.

28.Experimental Evidence Predictions of General Relativity Don't Work

29.What Is The Most Accurate Telescope?

30.VLBI Measurements: Only One Can Be Right.

31.Gravity Probe B: Mission Impossible?

32.Why Didn’t They Know 3D+1D Space and Time?

33.Astronomical Data Prove Spacetime Fiction.

34.Logical Fallacies Of Einstein's Theory.

35.Prediction on the 2017 Eclipse Proves Einstein Was Wrong.

36.Einstein’s Proving Method Via Eclipse Is Not Scientifically Correct and Deeply Wrong.

37.What’s Wrong With Measuring The Speed of Gravity in 2002?

38.Albert Einstein Failed in Three Classical Tests (Kindle eBook):

Amazon Kindle eBook

Paperback-Length 100 Pages

The main problem of general relativity is not test of hypothesis, but the hypothesis itself. Hypothesis and Einstein proposed test of general relativity are closely related to astronomy, especially celestial navigation. For understanding that hypothesis and the test are not valid, physics training is needed; but more importantly is celestial navigation training. The navigators around the world will be easily to know the fatal mistakes of Einstein's theories. 

Actually, general relativity can not be proven or tested in any way. No doubt, the entire tests that say ‘general relativity is correct’; really are the case of ‘knowing the result they wanted to get’. 

Last update: 7 Sebtember 2017

39.Sphere of Space and Time

40.What Exactly is Gravity?

41.Albert Einstein Began by Rejecting the Ether Theory.

42.Deflection of Light by Refraction, Not Gravity (Curve Geometry of Spacetime)

43.Albert Einstein’s Thought Experiment and Equivalence Principle are Misleading.

44.No doubt: Einstein’s General Theory Of Relativity Was Wrong-April, 2016.

Albert Einstein Was Innocent!

I know many renowned physicists (an inventor, professor, and experts) have rejected Einstein's theory. They had submitted their proof to Nature, but always rejected by Nature. Moreover, if they know that paper is made by someone who is not famous.

It made me think (maybe I was wrong), no need for peer review paper. International journals will refuse it. They are very embarrassed to publish it when knowing Einstein's mistake is an elementary level. The high school students easily are able to know about it. If they published it, it will drop the reputation of many the world renowned scientists and Universities (again, maybe I was wrong).

Actually, what I have found is not the same as they have found. What I have found was written in the book 'The Universe and Dr.Einstein', by Lincoln Barnett, London, 1949, foreword by Albert Einstein himself, page 78-79. He (Einstein) unknowingly has demonstrated to the world that he had no idea on the basic of astronomy.(Lincoln Barnett,The Universe and Dr Einstein)

Einstein's hypothesis of GR and he proposed test via eclipse are closely related to astronomy, especially celestial navigation. The navigators around the world easily are able to know:

1. Einstein’s hypothesis of GR is invalid. GR cannot be proven or tested in anyway whatsoever.

2. Einstein would like to measure deflection of light by the sun; but he proposed test deflection of light by earth's atmosphere. He had not realized about it. Ironically, this test is not scientifically correct and deeply wrong (as seen from scientifically of astronomy).

I think the next generation of scientists must know the truth about Einstein's relativity; as presented by a gentleman scientist below:

Is Einstein's Greatest Work All Wrong—Because He Didn't Go Far Enough? From a farmhouse in the English countryside, gentleman scientist Julian Barbour plots to take relativity to its logical extreme and redefine the very nature of gravity, space, and time. (Discovery Magazine)

HERE MY CLAIMS

There are at least 5 logical fallacies of Einstein's special and general theory of relativity, and this book reveals evidence and reasoning that general relativity doesn't meet the principles of scientific method.
This book try to convey prediction using astronomical test of general relativity  at 2017 total solar eclipse, in USA, August 21, and  shows that astronomical data of 2017 eclipse prove spacetime is false.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I would like to express my gratitude to the many people who saw me through my books; to all those who provided support, read, buy, and offered comments.

Thank so much to Lincoln Barnett, hopefully be happy in Heaven, for tells  me through his book The Universe and Dr.Einstein. Thank so much to Dr.Louis Essen, hopefully be happy in Heaven, and Professor Tom Van Flanderm, who make me sure about invalidity of general relativity.

Here my claims:

Einstein’s hypothesis of deflection of light by the Sun is false, and Einstein proposed test of deflection of light by the Sun via eclipse is not scientifically correct and deeply wrong, the results will always be an error. Einstein general theory of relativity was totally wrong. I’ve explained evidence and reasoning in this book entitle Logical Fallacies Of Special And General Theory Of Relativity, Second Edition: General Relativity Doesn’t Meet The Principles Of Scientific Method.

Last and not least: my apologies for any my shortcomings on writing in a language not my mother’s language.


Kindle eBook Amazon.

AMAZON.CO.UK

AMAZON FRANCE

AMAZON AUSTRALIA

EINSTEIN'S PROVING METHOD VIA ECLIPSE IS NOT SCIENTIFIC, DEEPLY WRONG.

For more than 100 years, we’ve only been playing around in experiments so far

Genius has two sides, cleverness and stupidity. General relativity is the stupidity. 

Einstein's proving method for his hypothesis of general relativity via eclipse is not scientific. Did you have any reason and facts?

Yes.Let's look at the picture below.

 Courtesy of google image

At the picture we see an illustration the deflection of starlight by gravity. Deflection of light is a different angular between Actual Position and Apparent position of star. Another term for Actual position is True Position, and another term for Apparent position is Observed Position of star. In astronomy, true position and observed position of star is three dimensional (the Celestial Coordinate System). In practice,  the deflection of light is a different Altitude or Height (H) between height of star at true position and height of star at observed position.

Then, let see the proving method as suggested by Albert Einstein:


“From these purely theoretical considerations Einstein concluded that light, like any material object, travels in a curve when passing through the gravitational field of a massive body. He suggested that his theory could be put to test by observing the path of starlight in the gravitational field of the sun. Since the stars are invisible by day, there is only one occasion when sun and stars can be seen together in the sky, and that is during an eclipse.

Einstein proposed therefore, that photographs be taken of the stars immediately bordering the darkened face of the sun during an eclipse and compared with photographs of those same stars made at another time. According to his theory, the light from the stars surrounding the sun should be bent inward, toward the sun, in traversing the sun’s gravitational field; hence the images of these stars should appear to observer on earth to be shifted outward from their usual positions in the sky.

Einstein calculated the degree of deflection that should be observed and predicted that for the stars closest to the sun the deviation would be about 1.75” (Lincoln Barnett, The Universe and Dr.Einstein, London, Victor Gollanez LTD, First Published June 1949, Preface by Albert Einstein, page 78-79 ).



Reasons and Facts ::

1. “Einstein proposed therefore, that photographs be taken of the stars immediately bordering the darkened face of the sun during an eclipse and compared with photographs of those same stars made at another time.”

The words ‘ made at another time ‘  means it was  NOT SCIENTIFIC in the scientific point of view of astronomy. Deeply wrong.

2.The deflection of light is a different angular between True Positions and Apparent Positions of the stars. From Einstein’s proving method via eclipse no one can determine True Positions of the star All of photographs be taken of the stars, before eclipse and during eclipse are the conditions of the stars in Apparent Positions.

It is really hard to understand that Einstein’s proving method of his hypothesis that was not scientific,  that was conducted by a team led by Arthur Eddington in 1919 solar Eclipse.

Expedition 1919 Solar Eclipse

Based on data from the Royal Astronomical Society, Arthur Eddington aimed to the group of Hyade stars from the city of Oxford in England at the nights in the months of January and February 1919. After that, Eddington together with his team left for Principe Island in West of Africa, and aimed to the Hyade stars during the solar eclipse on the date of May 29, 1919 at the city of Roca Sundy. Andrew Crommelin's team aimed to the Hyade stars during the solar eclipse from Sobral, Brazil.

Oxford, Roca Sundy and Sobral has it own CELESTIAL SPHERE : Celestial Sphere for an observer in Oxford, Celestial Sphere for an observer in Roca Sundy.and Celestial Sphere for an observer in Sobral.   

Portrait of star taken by an observer from Oxford and portrait the same star from Roca Sundy ( and from Sobral ) can not be compared, because the Celestial Sphere is only applicable at a certain time and at a certain place on which such observation is performed.

The result was ERROR. 

Facts :


Error and the deflection of light was certainly not measurable. 

Einstein predicted : 1.75 seconds of an arc.

Arthur Eddington : 1.61seconds of an arc. (During 1919 eclipse an observer in Roca Sundy. The weather conditions in Roca Sundy. Principe Island-West Africa, were interferret with by clouds).

Andrew Crommelin: 0.93 seconds of an arc.(During 1919 eclipse an observer in Sobral. The weather conditions in Sobral, Brazil, were excellent).

That is why Einstein never received a Nobel prize for relativity

The Nobel Prize in Physics 1921 was awarded to Albert Einstein "for his services to Theoretical Physics, and especially for his discovery of the law of the photoelectric effect".The Nobel citation reads that Einstein is honoured for "services to theoretical physics, and especially for his discovery of the law of the photoelectric effect".

At first glance, the reference to theoretical physics could have been a back door through which the committee acknowledged relativity. However, there was a caveat stating that the award was presented "without taking into account the value that will be accorded your relativity and gravitation theories after these are confirmed in the future".

To many, and to Einstein himself, this felt like a slap in the face. Hadn't Eddington proved the theory? Yes, but the trouble was Eddington's observations had not been perfect and he had discarded data he considered poor from his final analysis.

Read More:  Why Einstein Never Received a Nobel Prize for Relativity

Hadn't Eddington proved the theory?  NO. THAT WAS ERROR. BIG LIE IN SCIENCE FOR MORE THAN 100 YEARS. 

You can applied Einstein's proving method 1000 times and the result will be ERROR !

Read More:

About Sir Arthur Stanley Eddington 

Einstein Is Right About General Relativity - Again

Just experiments, again and again ....We’ve only been playing around in Newton’s world so far

If a scientist conveys a theory and at the same time shows its proving method, however after being examined it is found out that his proposed proving method is proven to be unable to be performed due to not being scientific, then automatically such proposed theory prematurely falls by itself. And the test cannot be carried out by other methods not as requested by the theory founder, since it is reasonably assumed that such proving is made based on belief. 

General Relativity Has Been Wrong Since the Beginning

BOLD EXPERIMENTS WILL PUT GENERAL RELATIVITY TO THE TEST

Powerful telescopes and huge gravitational wave detectors will test a theory that one man worked out a century ago with a pencil and paper.

Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity remade gravity and solved problems that Newton’s theory couldn’t. It’s passed each of the dozens of experimental tests devised since its debut in 1915. But physicists have barely gotten started.

“We’ve only been playing around in Newton’s world so far,” says Neil Cornish, a physicist at Montana State University. That will soon change, though, as several bold experiments enabled by telescopes of unprecedented reach — and in some cases by entirely new ways to gather data — are poised to study how gravity behaves around some of the universe’s most extreme objects.

“This is where general relativity really gets going,” says Cornish. Powerful telescopes are already looking for minute hiccups in the whirring of stellar corpses called pulsars. A global effort will soon photograph, for the first time, a black hole. And huge gravitational wave detectors will scan thousands of galaxies for tiny ripples in the cosmic fabric of space-time.

Each of these experiments — some of the most ambitious ever conceived — will test a theory that one man worked out a century ago with pencil and paper. Yet most physicists are still betting on that one man.

 Read More :

DISCOVERMAGAZINE

Paperback

If Einstein's theory of general relativity was correct, then the light from stars that passed closest to the sun would show the greatest degree of bending, and the stars whose light tracks are very far from the sun have their lights not being bent or deflected. The stars whose lights are not deflected means that there is no difference between the apparent position and the true position of the stars.
If being consistent with this theory, it means that all stars visible at night time are at the appearance of the stars on their true positions, because the said stars do not pass through the field of gravity. This is certainly incorrect if it is seen from the astronomical scientific point of view. The stars in the sky at night time and seen by the observers, all are stars on apparent positions, not on their true positions.

Einstein ignored light refraction: astronomical refraction and terrestrial refraction, and ignored three dimensional positions of stars (celestial sphere coordinate system), when he proposed the proving method for general relativity. Einstein's proving method via eclipse is not scientific and deeply wrong. General Relativity has been wrong since the beginning.

Did you know news in Physics 11 February 2016 (LIGO Experiment )?

Ironically amazing, collision of two black holes was detected and to prove  'The Reluctant Father of Black Holes' was right.

ECLIPSE 1919 : INTRODUCTION

Einstein ignored light refraction through the Earth's atmosphere when he desires used a method for validating his General Theory of Relativity in 1919.

The proving method / tests on the theory of general relativity as requested by its founder, Albert Einstein, is unjustifiable from scientific point of view of the astronomy. 

If a scientist conveys a theory and at the same time shows its proving method/tests, however after being tested by another scientist it is found out that his proposed proving method is proven to be unable to be performed due to not being scientific, then automatically such proposed theory prematurely falls by itself. The proving cannot be carried out by other methods not as requested by the theory founder, since it is reasonably assumed that such proving is made based on belief.

LHC (Large Hadron Collider) cannot be used as evidence of scientific discovery, because no one  can prove them wrong. LHC is no more than a scientific fraud.  Construction and operation of the LHC shows modern physics in the great crisis.

INTRODUCTION 

   Alphonsus Kelly, an Ireland engineer, in his lecture at Trinity College, Dublin, on February 15, 1996, stated that the Einstein’s Relativity theory might be wrong. Kelly revealed the experiment of Sagnac, the French physicist in the year 1914, showing that the time taken by a light to complete one rotation is found to be different from the time taken by one rotation in opposite direction. The Sagnac’s experiment proved that the speed of light was not constant. It is different from Einstein’s theory stating that the light velocity is constant.

   

   Reaction was given by an English astronomer, Arnold Wolfendale, stating that to design an experiment to prove that the light velocity is not constant is really a difficult thing to do.

   

   “ You cannot demolish a very strong theory such as Einstein’s Relativity only be based on a cheap experiment,” said Wolfendale reffering to Kelly’s opinion indicating that Enstein was wrong just based on Sagnac’s experiment. Wolfendale added that the particle accelerator all over the world have proven the truth of Einstein’s Relativity.

  

   “ We are engineer, will never give up, “ said Kelly to The Times. “ I know there is a priest preaching a mystery not known to him, and I think the physicists do the same thing.”

   Einstein’s theories, either Special Relativity or General Relativity, in principle arose from the firmness and faith of Einstein upon the harmony of universe. Einstein believed the universe was entirely always symmetrical and harmonious that should have been created by Supreme Intelligence.

   

   In gigantic scale, the universe is so homogenous. In whatever directions we look at all dots in the sky, they look the same and uniform. This is frequently asked by the scientists, and it creates the idea about the theory of establishment of universe, the beginning and the end of the universe in their opinions.

   

   Einstein’s general relativity theory stating that the natural law for all systems were equally applicable without being affected by their movements. This was a development of Special Relativity, and was announced in 1916. Einstein also issued a hypothesis considering the light as a particle. Therefore, light is influenced by gravity. Based on this hypothesis Einstein concluded that the light just as other material objects, moved in curve if gravity field of an object was massive. Such Einstein’s hypothesis on light caused dualism in modern physics, namely Dualism of Particle Wave.

   Justification or denial to a certain theory is best proven by self-proving concept. The self-proving concept was first presented by Aristotle in the 3^rd  century BC. Such a concept was also strongly held by Einstein, in which he was reluctant to accept a non self-proving theory.

   Many theories of physics exposed at the beginning of the 20^th century were self-proving, such as Photoelectric Effects conducted by Einstein, as a support to the Quantum Theory presented by Max Planck in 1900, that had been self-proven. It even produced the most admired technology at present : Information Technology.

   But Einstein’s Relativity Theory, from the beginning until now is still controversy. Let us note that in practice for the General Relativity Theory, if Einstein’s theory of general relativity was correct, then the light from stars that passed closest to the sun would show the greatest  degree of bending, and the stars whose light tracks are very far from the sun have their lights not being bent or deflected. The stars whose lights are not deflected means that there is no difference between the apparent position and the true position of the stars.

Illustration above was incorrect:  Apparent Position should be look higher than Actual Position

   If being consistent with this theory, it means that all stars visible at night time are at the appearance of the stars on their true positions, because the said stars do not pass through the field of gravity. This is certainly incorrect if it is seen from the astronomical scientific point of view.  The stars  in the sky at night time and seen by the observers, all are stars on apparent positions, not on their true / actual  positions.

EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY WAS TOTALLY WRONG

Einstein ignored light refraction through the Earth's atmosphere when he desires used a method for validating his General Theory of Relativity in 1919.

Albert Einstein proposed three tests of the general relativity theory:

1.the perihelion precession of Mercury’s orbit.

2.the deflection of light by the Sun.

3.the gravitational redshift of light