Alphonsus Kelly, an Ireland engineer, in his
lecture at Trinity College, Dublin, on February 15, 1996, stated that the
Einstein’s Relativity theory might be wrong. Kelly revealed the experiment of Sagnac,
the French physicist in the year 1914, showing that the time taken by a light
to complete one rotation is found to be different from the time taken by one
rotation in opposite direction. The Sagnac’s experiment proved that the speed
of light was not constant. It is different from Einstein’s teory stating that
the light velocity is constant.
Reaction was given by an English astronomer,
Arnold Wolfendale, stating that to design an experiment to prove that the light
velocity is not constant is really a difficult thing to do.
“ You cannot demolish a very strong theory such
as Einstein’s Relativity only be based on a cheap experiment,” said Wolfendale
reffering to Kelly’s opinion indicating that Enstein was wrong just based on
Sagnac’s experiment. Wolfendale added that the particle accelerator all over
the world have proven the truth of Einstein’s Relativity.
“ We are engineer, will never give up, “ said
Kelly to The Times. “ I know there is a priest preaching a mystery not known to
him, and I think the physicists do the same thing.”
Einstein’s Relativity claimed to be erroneous by
Alphonsus Kelly is the one related to the light velocity. Possibly his claim is
true, if he is given a chance to prove it, either by means of pure theory or by
a support of an experiment. It is not fair to declare that Kelly’s claim is a
wrong just only by reffering to the particle accelerator machine. There is no
doubt about superiority of the particle accelerator machine, hovewer, the limit
of human sensory of sight constitutes a hindrance difficult to avoid.
In addition, Einstein himself exposed his theories shaking the classical theory of physic, not by using the accelerator machine either. He merely used the pure theoretical method with his brilliant analysis and simple experiment, and even the imaginary experiment.
Sagnac's Experiment ( newtonphysics.on.ca )
In addition, Einstein himself exposed his theories shaking the classical theory of physic, not by using the accelerator machine either. He merely used the pure theoretical method with his brilliant analysis and simple experiment, and even the imaginary experiment.
Sagnac's Experiment ( newtonphysics.on.ca )
Let us assume that you have a source of light (a laser) at a certain location on Earth (e.g. your home). You project that beam of light directly toward a satellite in orbit around the Earth on which there is a reflecting mirror. After that first reflection, light reaches other mirrors in space so that it can finally complete a full turn around the Earth and reach again the same spot on Earth where light has been emitted.
Using that apparatus, you can measure the time it takes for light to make a complete turn around the Earth when light moves from West to East. Now, if you repeat the same experiment, with the same mirrors, (or even do it simultaneously), using light moving from East to West, you find that the time taken by light to move from East to West is shorter than the time taken for light to complete the revolution in the opposite direction. That difference of time is observed with the same apparatus, making simultaneous measurements, at the same location. One can show that this difference is due to the Classical Newtonian motion of Earth rotation. That difference of time for light taken between each direction depends directly on the velocity of the Earth moving around itself.
Einstein's Theory claims that there is no possible way to detect the ABSOLUTE velocity of the Earth. The very use of the expression RELATIVITY comes from Einstein's hypothesis that parameters, like VELOCITY, are relative so that any absolute motion (like absolute velocity) is meaningless. However, we see above, that the velocity of Earth is responsible for the change of time light takes to go around the Earth. From a fixed location on Earth, we can detect the Earth's motion. Therefore, contrary to Einstein principle of relativity, the velocity of light is not relative to the observer. One must conclude that the Sagnac effect contradicts Einstein's hypothesis of General Relativity.
Let us note that in practice, the Sagnac effect is observed quite easily. In order to observe that effect, you do not have to make a full circle around the Earth. If you make light rotate around a diameter of only one meter and many rotations, (in either directions) you will observe the same effect. The slight change of time interval to travel in either directions can be detected using interference patterns between the beams moving simultaneously in opposite directions. This method is very sensitive to detect a very small rate of rotation. Such an observation is very important in ships (or spaceships) and in airplanes. It is a kind of optical gyroscope (laser gyroscope) manufactured commercially in large number. This optical gyroscope detects the absolute velocity of the rotating Earth from any location on Earth, even if Einstein's theory claims that light travels with respect to the observer.
There is also a Straight-Line-Component Sagnac effect. This will not be developed here. The Sagnac effect has been discussed in many papers. Recently, A. Kelly (The Sagnac Effect and GPS Synchronization of Clock-Stations) presented a paper at the meeting of "Galileo Back in Italy", Bologna May 1999. Ref. A. G. Kelly, HDS Energy Limited Celbridge, Co, Kildare, Ireland. The Sagnac effect on the GPS Clock synchronization is extremely important.
One can conclude that you can possess now your own instrument that measures the ABSOLUTE velocity of rotation of the Earth, which is in striking contradiction with Einstein's Theory of Relativity, while most of the scientists still refuse to accept that this can actually work. This is the most striking proof that Einstein's Theory of General Relativity is wrong.
Amazon eBook Kindle
If a scientist conveys a theory and at the same time shows its proving method, however after being tested by another scientist it is found out that his proposed proving method is proven to be unable to be performed due to not being scientific, then automatically such proposed theory prematurely falls by itself. The proving cannot be carried out by other methods not as requested by the theory founder, since it is reasonably assumed that such proving is made based on belief.
CreateSpace, Paperback, Edition 2
Full Color,
